[Arthur McGowan]

Boortz loved to spew his pro-abortionism on the radio, all the while saying, “And I’m not going to take any calls from you anti-abortion people.”

Anybody who thinks this country can survive while killing millions of babies is dreaming.

[RaceBannon]

neils boortz social libertarian brand has prevented a republican majority

[PetroniusMaximus]

Neil may be an idiot, but he absolutely NAILED the last election when almost nobody on our side was even close to right.

[MtnClimber]

I heard a brief moment of this show and did not know who was subbing. I changed channels pretty darned quickly. Now I know who this @%&! was.

[billhilly]

They’ll keep the House, but they’re not going to get the Senate and I’ll tell you why – because they simply cannot resist the urge, the impulse to get into this social conservatism.” – Neal Boortz

Filling in for Sean Hannity earlier this week, Neal Boortz suggested that Republicans will be unable to take the House in 2014, and that the reason will be social conservatives and cultural issues.

Duh

[Mortrey]

Off topic, but for those that may be interested in this great interview—it will keep you in your seat; read FreeRepublic while listening to this interview of Jim Garrow by Dave Hodges on republicbroadcasting:

The Dave Hodges show on tonight IS a rerun of the one on December 22nd that was so fantastic—

http://republicbroadcasting.org/

[allblues]

I heard Boortz on this show and was again reminded why I detest morality free libertarians.

[Impy]

Our target seats are in conservative states. Embracing faggotry isn’t gonna help to beat Mary Landrieu.

[Joshua]

Those social moderates really did a bang up job in the last two presidential races. Friggen morons

[tennmountainman]

Hey Boortz, when the GOP passes amnesty, most conservatives, including
myself won’t even show up to vote. So, the GOP will lose because of the GOP, not social conservatives.

[VerySadAmerican]

If all the gop can give us are rinos, I just as soon not see them win.

[citizen]

Yep...let’s run the Todd Akin and the Sharron Angle and the 2010 O’Donnell campaigns again.

Those should have been three R wins, moving the Conservatives close to capturing the Senate. Senate control this cycle would have been assured if the Rs had just simply run sensible, winable candidates in those three elections.

[Big Mack]

I am getting tired of the liberals picking our candidates for everything and the GOPe falling behind them.
I think the libs are running so scared of conservatives that they vilify us with every breath they take.
I am rapidly losing hope that we will b e able to keep our country without bloodshed.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Here's the thing. Even if Republicans abandon social conservatism, the Democrats will put them on the spot anyway.

Better for Republicans to stand their ground and defend life, traditional values, and the family, rather than answer ridiculous hypothetical questions that will get played in the media and then they stupidly grovel and apologize for, in which they'll lose those voters down the road They weren't socially conservative to begin with if they had to apologize about being "misspoken" - ahem.

Boortz is completely, totally wrong. Fiscal and social conservatism are interchangeable and inseparable. One cannot exist without the other.

[Bryan24]

It’s guys like Boortz that drive Conservatives to stay at home. He blasts and rips CONSERVATIVES and leaves the liberals alone. If they aren’t in his little libertarian strain of the GOP, he trashes them

[Rock Eye Jack]

I have always liked Hannity. But why would he ever give this baby killing dirt bag air time at Christmas.

[Mamzelle]

Boortz, who made it big as an agent for a boxer. Never could hope to touch Limbaugh.

Just a cheesy lawyer… why do they all love them some abortions so much…?

[jobim]

The re-election of Obama made manifest the lie that Guv-Lite (ie sepulchered GOP) is the first step in taking our nation back from Progessivism. There is either Progressivism, or there is Constitutionalism. 2012 was the final election when Conservatives would vote for a sepulchered GOP candidate. Any such candidate will now lose by a vast margin to the Maoist. There is only one alternative: a true Constitutional Conservative, and that candidate will always win handily.

[hinckley buzzard]

Shows how stupid the average republican "Thinker" is. There is no reason whatsoever that social conservatism needs to be an obstacle to election. The appropriate tactic is to do what the left does. Send a clear message to the base but campaign on the mainstream issues. You can be pro life and anti-homosexual adoption without making a lightning rod out of it.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Of what value is a republican “majority” in the Senate if they all vote with the Dems? Ten more Grahams and McCains?

Half the so called republicans in the Senate now piss themselves when Dingy Harry scowls at them. More RINO pussies like that will do what to advance the cause of rescuing the Republic?

The liberal pubbies are getting nervous that we are not voting for the lesser of two evils this time around and they are trying to preempt it early on.

It’s absolutely amazing. Here in KY, McConnell will supply the Vaseline for Reid to screw him and ten minutes later will be trying to destroy Kentucky conservatives with vile advertisements.

Are they finally figuring out that we have decided we have nothing to gain by voting for them? And their solution will be to further screw us.

This is just so damn disgusting.