So is evolution.
Furthermore, it is mathematically solvent.
I have no idea what that means.
People who reject General Relativity, even nowadays, are not called “deniers”, impugned and derided as intellectually deficient, and likened to cultists involved with nature deities.
That may be in large part because there is no well-funded, organized effort to keep General Relativity from being taught in schools or, if taught, being accompanied by a counter-theory with little supporting evidence. And people who reject GR don't generally tell those who accept it that they're doing Satan's work and are likely going to hell.
Another reason is that GR isn't something most people see in action, so they only relate to it theoretically. What about my examples? What if there were a bunch of people insisting that disease was caused by bad humors, and demanding that schools "teach the controversy," and complaining that they didn't get hired to teach in medical schools because of their beliefs? You don't think doctors and scientists would argue against them using exactly the same kinds of terms that "evolutionists" use for evolution deniers?
>> For one, General Relativity is falsifiable
> So is evolution.
Really? How so?
>> Furthermore, it [General Relativity] is mathematically solvent.
> I have no idea what that means.
It simply means that the theory of General Relativity was submitted with mathematical proof.
> there is no well-funded, organized effort to keep General
> Relativity from being taught in schools or, if taught,
> being accompanied by a counter-theory with little
> supporting evidence.
There are many alternatives to General Relativity being taught, most of them exponents of Quantum Mechanics. As far as I know, there are no well organized, well funded efforts to keep such teaching out of the schools, nor is there any punishment for supporting or believing them.
Evloutionism is taught and promoted in the same manner as Global Warmism.
> Another reason is that GR isn’t something most people see in action
You can’t be serious. What holds you to the ground? Think before you react.
> hat if there were a bunch of people insisting that
> disease was caused by bad humors, and demanding that
> schools “teach the controversy,” and complaining that
> they didn’t get hired to teach in medical schools because
> of their beliefs?
Argumentum ad absurdum. We can see the little buggies in microscopes. Nobody has seen a shrew turn into a bat or a photosensitive cell turn into an eye.
> You don’t think doctors and scientists would argue
> against them using exactly the same kinds of terms that
> “evolutionists” use for evolution deniers?
Just to set the record straight, I am also a Global Warming “denier”.
Your use of the pejorative term of the Global Warmists says something about you that you may not want it to say.