> Minor point, all data and observation is evidence for something.
Yes, but just like the Global Warmists, the evolutionist assumes all data is evidence for his pet theory, regardless of how absurd the gyrations must be to make it so.
You appear to be quite unfamiliar with how things actually work. Not accepting statements of what is best known to be true to the best of our abilities based on set, rigid testing procedures is actually built into the process.
Should a more reasonable explanation based on these standards arise, whatever conclusions drawn would have to change based on the new evidence. Incredulity for those conclusions is by itself evidence of nothing other than contempt for scientific methodology.