What was so incendiary? There was nothing hateful here.
These professional homos just don’t like it.
That’s too damned bad for them.
And I mean bad.
So Robertson stands up for the Bible and that’s offensive and incendiary...Nothing has changed in 2000 years. Jesus said we would be persecuted for following Him.
Amen to the Robertsons!
FREEGARDS
LEX
If they weren't "anti-gay", I'm not sure I'd like them.
Phil Robertson simply stated a truth. Christians must believe and follow God’s Word as revealed in the Bible. Homosexuality is a sin. There can be no reasonable doubt about that, and any homosexual who attempts to warp scripture to say sodomy is OK is deluded to the point where they are risking eternal damnation.
Phil Robertson was also correct when he said homosexuals shouldn’t be singled out for poor treatment. Phil, like all of us Christians, is a sinner. The key difference between a believer and non-believer is repentance. That’s why Phil’s youthful sins, adultery, drunkenness, etc., are forgiven.
Lying about the Bible in order to make homosexuals feel good about their sin would be far, far worse than telling them the truth. Phil is actually showing love and care for homosexual sinners by explaining how they can be forgiven. The ones who condemn Phil are actually liars who hate homosexuals, because they’re the ones who won’t lift a hand to help a fallen sinner.
And the LGBTQ crowd makes up what part of the duck call market?
For the Liberals and their media, “tolerance” translates to: “thinks like we do”, and a “diverse society” translates to “everyone has the same views of society and morality”.
In essence, Liberals are not truly for either tolerance or diversity because that would mean tolerance for everyone who strongly disagrees with their point of view on many issues and it would mean a society that did not reflect diverse points of view.
What’s considered sin in ‘’his’’ book? It isn’t ‘’his’’ book that matters an iota. It’s “”HIS”” book that matters!
The inability to see the difference shows the article’s author’s abject ignorance. The author should confine writings to topics he knows something about.
“Offensive” to whom?
He is just saying the same thing that Pope Francis says and has always believed, and he is Time’s and gay men’s “Man of the Year.”
A devoted Christian said homosexuality is sin? Oh the horror!
He said nothing untrue and absolutely nothing hateful.
Dang. I gotta buy me a Phil shirt and start wearing it around. The sashayers will hate it.
Headlines We’ll Never See:
“Gay ‘Marriage’ Proponent Makes Incendiary Comments About Christians”
I suspect ratings will go up. And I’m sure some other network would pick them up.
Another battle in the culture war. Well, sodomy will be defended—no, it will be CELEBRATED by the media.
Duck Dynasty guy will be targeted for destruction.
I’m sure the fluffers have never bought a duck call. They suck on other things.
Another Chic-fil-a opportunity to tell the GLBSQBJUVFTI crowd to stick it, I’m thinking. I’ll certainly support the Robertsons.
Well? Can't argue with that!