Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Naval Vessel Tries to Force U.S. Warship to Stop in International Waters
Washington Free Beacon ^ | 12/13/2013 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 12/13/2013 2:57:59 AM PST by markomalley

A Chinese naval vessel tried to force a U.S. guided missile warship to stop in international waters recently, causing a tense military standoff in the latest case of Chinese maritime harassment, according to defense officials.

The guided missile cruiser USS Cowpens, which recently took part in disaster relief operations in the Philippines, was confronted by Chinese warships in the South China Sea near Beijing’s new aircraft carrier Liaoning, according to officials familiar with the incident.

“On December 5th, while lawfully operating in international waters in the South China Sea, USS Cowpens and a PLA Navy vessel had an encounter that required maneuvering to avoid a collision,” a Navy official said.

“This incident underscores the need to ensure the highest standards of professional seamanship, including communications between vessels, to mitigate the risk of an unintended incident or mishap.”

A State Department official said the U.S. government issued protests to China in both Washington and Beijing in both diplomatic and military channels.

The Cowpens was conducting surveillance of the Liaoning at the time. The carrier had recently sailed from the port of Qingdao on the northern Chinese coast into the South China Sea.

According to the officials, the run-in began after a Chinese navy vessel sent a hailing warning and ordered the Cowpens to stop. The cruiser continued on its course and refused the order because it was operating in international waters.

Then a Chinese tank landing ship sailed in front of the Cowpens and stopped, forcing the Cowpens to abruptly change course in what the officials said was a dangerous maneuver.

According to the officials, the Cowpens was conducting a routine operation done to exercise its freedom of navigation near the Chinese carrier when the incident occurred about a week ago.

The encounter was the type of incident that senior Pentagon officials recently warned could take place as a result of heightened tensions in the region over China’s declaration of an air defense identification zone (ADIZ) in the East China Sea.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently called China’s new air defense zone destabilizing and said it increased the risk of a military “miscalculation.”

China’s military forces in recent days have dispatched Su-30 and J-11 fighter jets, as well as KJ-2000 airborne warning and control aircraft, to the zone to monitor the airspace that is used frequently by U.S. and Japanese military surveillance aircraft.

The United States has said it does not recognize China’s ADIZ, as has Japan’s government.

Two U.S. B-52 bombers flew through the air zone last month but were not shadowed by Chinese interceptor jets.

Chinese naval and air forces also have been pressing Japan in the East China Sea over Tokyo’s purchase a year ago of several uninhabited Senkaku Islands located north of Taiwan and south of Okinawa.

China is claiming the islands, which it calls the Diaoyu. They are believed to contain large undersea reserves of natural gas and oil.

The Liaoning, China’s first carrier that was refitted from an old Soviet carrier, and four warships recently conducted their first training maneuvers in the South China Sea. The carrier recently docked at the Chinese naval port of Hainan on the South China Sea.

Defense officials have said China’s imposition of the ADIZ is aimed primarily at curbing surveillance flights in the zone, which China’s military regards as a threat to its military secrets.

The U.S. military conducts surveillance flights with EP-3 aircraft and long-range RQ-4 Global Hawk drones.

In addition to the Liaoning, Chinese warships in the flotilla include two missile destroyers, the Shenyang and the Shijiazhuang, and two missile frigates, the Yantai and the Weifang.

Rick Fisher, a China military affairs expert, said it is likely that the Chinese deliberately staged the incident as part of a strategy of pressuring the United States.

“They can afford to lose an LST [landing ship] as they have about 27 of them, but they are also usually armed with one or more twin 37 millimeter cannons, which at close range could heavily damage a lightly armored U.S. Navy destroyer,” said Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

Most Chinese Navy large combat ships would be out-ranged by the 127-millimeter guns deployed on U.S. cruisers, except China’s Russian-made Sovremenny-class ships and Beijing’s new Type 052D destroyers that are armed with 130-millimeter guns.

The encounter appears to be part of a pattern of Chinese political signaling that it will not accept the presence of American military power in its East Asian theater of influence, Fisher said.

“China has spent the last 20 years building up its Navy and now feels that it can use it to obtain its political objectives,” he said.

Fisher said that since early 2012 China has gone on the offensive in both the South China and East China Seas.

“In this early stage of using its newly acquired naval power, China is posturing and bullying, but China is also looking for a fight, a battle that will cow the Americans, the Japanese, and the Filipinos,” he said.

To maintain stability in the face of Chinese military assertiveness, Fisher said the United States and Japan should seek an armed peace in the region by heavily fortifying the Senkaku Islands and the rest of the island chain they are part of.

“The U.S. and Japan should also step up their rearmament of the Philippines,” Fisher said.

The Cowpens incident is the most recent example of Chinese naval aggressiveness toward U.S. ships.

The U.S. intelligence-gathering ship, USNS Impeccable, came under Chinese naval harassment from a China Maritime Surveillance ship, part of Beijing’s quasi-military maritime patrol craft, in June.

During that incident, the Chinese ship warned the Navy ship it was operating illegally despite sailing in international waters. The Chinese demanded that the ship first obtain permission before sailing in the area that was more than 100 miles from China’s coast.

The U.S. military has been stepping up surveillance of China’s naval forces, including the growing submarine fleet, as part of the U.S. policy of rebalancing forces to the Pacific.

The Impeccable was harassed in March 2009 by five Chinese ships that followed it and sprayed it with water hoses in an effort to thwart its operations.

A second spy ship, the USNS Victorious, also came under Chinese maritime harassment several years ago.

Adm. Samuel Locklear, when asked last summer about increased Chinese naval activities near Guam and Hawaii in retaliation for U.S. ship-based spying on China, said the dispute involves different interpretations of controlled waters.

Locklear said in a meeting with reporters in July, “We believe the U.S. position is that those activities are less constrained than what the Chinese believe.”

China is seeking to control large areas of international waters—claiming they are part of its United Nations-defined economic exclusion zone—that Locklear said cover “most of the major sea lines of communication” near China and are needed to remain free for trade and shipping.

Locklear, who is known for his conciliatory views toward the Chinese military, sought to play down recent disputes. When asked if the Chinese activities were troubling, he said: “I would say it’s not provocative certainly. I’d say that in the Asia-Pacific, in the areas that are closer to the Chinese homeland, that we have been able to conduct operations around each other in a very professional and increasingly professional manner.”

The Pentagon and U.S. Pacific Command have sought to develop closer ties to the Chinese military as part of the Obama administration’s Asia pivot policies.

However, China’s military has shown limited interest in closer ties.

China’s state-controlled news media regularly report that the United States is seeking to defeat China by encircling the country with enemies while promoting dissidents within who seek the ouster of the communist regime.

The Obama administration has denied it is seeking to “contain” China and has insisted it wants continued close economic and diplomatic relations.

President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to seek a new type of major power relationship during a summit in California earlier this year. However, the exact nature of the new relationship remains unclear.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: adiz; china; chinesemilitary; chinesenavy; energy; maritime; naturalgas; oil; philippines; redchina; shipmovement; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 421-424 next last
To: Partisan Gunslinger

As soon as your ChiComs friends step in it over a stupid island and God forbid a real war you Free Traitors become just plain traitors. As soon as the first container ship hits the bottom all of the “offshoring” bullcrap goes out the window. Can’t happen soon enough IMO.


301 posted on 12/13/2013 5:46:50 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
Good let’s agree that we don’t want a centrally managed economy like our ChiCom buds have

Fixed it for you

302 posted on 12/13/2013 5:48:23 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I agree 100%.

America is collapsing.

Bring back jobs to America. Now. We need to stop selling out America.

For crying out loud.


303 posted on 12/13/2013 5:52:54 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: central_va

My comment was on the USA. I am aware of China’s political proclivities. It doesn’t make your point for you. Free trade is still better for America.


304 posted on 12/13/2013 5:56:53 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Let's sum up the positions of our Free Trade "Friends" shall we?

  1. The American blue collar worker is lazy shiftless pos unworthy of a paycheck
  2. If you don't get into management at some point you are worthless
  3. Offshoring production to a slavocracy and potential enemy is considered the height of freedom
  4. Displaced factory workers should just retrain to be brain surgeons and software engineers
  5. The ChiComs are more free than we are.

That is a few add some if you would like.

305 posted on 12/13/2013 6:01:08 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

You don’t seem able to absorb any new information or learn. You’ve been asked time and again which jobs you want brought back. You’ve been shown that a government budget deficit isn’t a trade “deficit”(trade deficits are pretend) and that free trade is beneficial.

That’s why I suspect you’re a troll. Most conservatives try to learn and understand how free trade works.


306 posted on 12/13/2013 6:03:49 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

I repeat: As soon as your ChiComs friends step in it over a stupid island and God forbid a real war you Free Traitors become just plain traitors. As soon as the first container ship hits the bottom all of the “offshoring” bullcrap goes out the window. Can’t happen soon enough IMO.


307 posted on 12/13/2013 6:04:44 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You’re looking forward to a war between the US and China?


308 posted on 12/13/2013 6:05:54 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Don't know how much of that is true, and how much you made up, as always . . . but I thought we were discussing how much you want to raise my taxes to avoid 1-5, above.

Or will you simply place your faith in government, as always?

309 posted on 12/13/2013 6:06:42 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
That’s why I suspect you’re a troll. Most conservatives try to learn and understand how free trade works.

Here is how it works: bend over and take a corn cobb and insert it into your exhaust pipe. Don't ever pull it out. That is how offshoring works.

310 posted on 12/13/2013 6:07:04 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Of course he is. Like a mother-in-law, he patiently waits to say, “I told you so.”


311 posted on 12/13/2013 6:07:54 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Read this thread and that is the take away. On that list which of those things do you disagree with?


312 posted on 12/13/2013 6:08:21 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: central_va

6. China now exports more than America (or anywhere else).
7. Jobs which go to China, leave America.
8. We are 17,000,000,000,000.00 in debt.
9. We import EVERYTHING.

America needs to bring back American jobs.

Now.


313 posted on 12/13/2013 6:09:00 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

10. Obamacare


314 posted on 12/13/2013 6:10:11 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
You’re looking forward to a war between the US and China?

It is coming, it is question of when. The sooner the better while we can still sustain a fight. If we wait much longer we will have no manufacturing base left and they win by default. Simple as that.

315 posted on 12/13/2013 6:12:04 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: central_va

How about reforming our corporate income tax system, instead of increasing taxes on U.S. citizens?


316 posted on 12/13/2013 6:13:27 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Playing dodge ball again I see. Not refuting the list? What don’t you agree with?


317 posted on 12/13/2013 6:18:38 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You know how you come across? Some old, cranky old fart who just wants his Social Security checks to keep coming until he’s gone, and thinking “to hell with the rest of you.”


318 posted on 12/13/2013 6:20:14 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

“So how far was the Cowpens from the Liaoning? I can’t tell from the article. How close would we let a Chinese cruiser get to one of our aircraft carriers? “

Good question. Carriers are the most important ships in any navy. You don’t let any credible threat get close to one before shooting.


319 posted on 12/13/2013 7:08:58 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You’re the most vulgar conservative I’ve ever met. I suspect your bona fides, are you a longshoreman?


320 posted on 12/13/2013 7:11:27 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 421-424 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson