I am confused. I thought this was the cross that there was a fight over which was on government property and a group was able to purchase that spot of land and keep the cross there. Or was that another one in California?
I don't know if there has been another cross, but every cross is a target, obviously, for they all mean the same.
The history of the thing is not in dispute, a cross was put up privately as a memorial and the family left the property to the city back at a time where it would've been unthinkable for such a thing to be controversial.
Moving it won't work well because it's concrete and that would defeat the point anyway.