Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye, sequestration! (For now. Maybe.)
Yahoo ^

Posted on 12/10/2013 5:20:04 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Goodbye, sequestration! (For now. Maybe.)

After years of partisan discord, can Congress agree to a budget compromise?

Chris Moody, Yahoo News By Chris Moody, Yahoo News 1 hour ago

The bipartisan spending resolution released Tuesday after months of negotiations gives Congress a final opportunity to save face after a congressional year known best for a government shutdown, inactivity and bickering.

Will they take the opportunity?

The budget chiefs, Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Republican Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, unveiled a two-year budget blueprint Tuesday evening that would avoid the possibility of a government shutdown scenario next year. According to Paul and Murray, the resolution would reduce the federal deficit by up to $23 billion over two years without raising taxes and provide $63 billion in what the lawmakers called “sequester relief" that gives spending flexibility to bipartisan interests like education, medical research and defense. That "relief" is offset by other "deficit-reduction provisions," which will be released soon. The resolution would set spending at $1.012 trillion, and $1.014 trillion in FY 2014 and FY 2015, respectively.

The agreement will by no means resolve major differences between the parties in the long run or solve the nation’s ongoing debt and deficit problems. (One observer dubbed it “The Bland Bargain.”) But it's a start, and offers a small opening of bipartisan agreement largely unseen in Washington for years.

Ryan and Murray are both aware they aren't making history, calling the new blueprint “a step in the right direction” and “a clear improvement on the status quo.” If passed, the budget resolution would “get our government functioning at the most basic levels,” Ryan said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: veroniquederugy
zilch.....
1 posted on 12/10/2013 5:20:04 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

2 posted on 12/10/2013 5:23:52 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ryan can go to hell!!!

vote the socialist bastard out!


3 posted on 12/10/2013 5:25:01 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The deficit is $1,275,000,000,000 and they are going to reduce it $23,000,000,000 isn’t that same as 23/1275?
So what is that like a reduction of 0.2%


4 posted on 12/10/2013 5:26:08 PM PST by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Its a good beginning... I was worried we’d be left with a “hollowed-out” military. That has been averted and we’re still going to see cuts in spending, just not the senseless cuts imposed by the sequester.

It is perfect? No - but nothing life is and its a modest Christmas going away present.


5 posted on 12/10/2013 5:27:09 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

ryan / boner are rushing to pass the budget so they can move on to ‘comprehensive immigration reform’. we’re screwed


6 posted on 12/10/2013 5:29:28 PM PST by ChiefJayStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Does anyone have a link to the Website where the details are posted (according to Ryan)? That’s where the “devils” reside.

I haven’t been able to find it yet.


7 posted on 12/10/2013 5:31:38 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

This is the best analysis of the deal I’ve read so far:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/365963/beware-upcoming-ryan-murray-budget-deal-veronique-de-rugy#comments

Bottom line - it sucks rotten eggs and the RINOs are selling us out again.


8 posted on 12/10/2013 5:37:24 PM PST by Nicojones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
A good beginning? We will continue to spend and spend. Defense is going to have to be pared down regardless. We can't afford it as long as the welfare state remains intact. Eliminating the sequester cuts will not rein in the welfare state.

I bet on closer examination of the proposed agreement, there will be plenty of revenue increases in the form of fees (no taxes) and few real cuts, which will be made years from now. This is all smoke and mirrors to avoid another showdown with the Dems who have all the leverage.

9 posted on 12/10/2013 5:42:34 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Raises the federal Airline ticket fees from 2.50 each way to 5.00 each way. Another tax.... oops FEE.


10 posted on 12/10/2013 5:43:31 PM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Spend, spend, spend ...


11 posted on 12/10/2013 5:46:10 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Its a good beginning... I was worried we’d be left with a “hollowed-out” military. That has been averted and we’re still going to see cuts in spending, just not the senseless cuts imposed by the sequester.

At $682b in 2013, our defense expenditures are 4x China's and more than the next 10 countries put together. No danger of hollowing out from $50b in sequester cuts that take the number down to $632b, after which the usual automatic inflation multiplier is added on for the rest of time.

12 posted on 12/10/2013 5:48:17 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Can’t agree: they’re JUST SPENDING MORE money.
If they had made some responsible decisions instead of JUST SPENDING MORE money... but they didn’t.

They won’t keep gutting the military: without a robust military they will not be able to borrow so much, nor maintain the dollar as the reseve currency.


13 posted on 12/10/2013 5:56:56 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Heard Ryan on Levin’s show tonight.

It’s all window dressing, it’s all designed to give talking points to the RINOs facing primary challengers.

It doesn’t do a damned thing except IMMEDIATELY raise spending and make ‘cuts’ in the increase of the rate of spending growth OVER TEN YEARS.

Its nothing but bovine excrement designed to silence the Conservatives in the Tea Party.


14 posted on 12/10/2013 6:01:48 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is like a bunch of people in a sinking boat arguing over how to fix the 10 ft hole and compromising by enlarging the hole to 12 ft. instead of 15 ft. Rejoice!!


15 posted on 12/10/2013 6:03:16 PM PST by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson