Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals want to stop men from checking out women
The Daily Caller ^ | 12/8/2013 | Patrick Howley

Posted on 12/09/2013 3:17:48 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: markomalley

When they stop wearing tight clothes and skimpy shorts I’ll stop looking.


41 posted on 12/09/2013 4:24:04 AM PST by raybbr (I weep over my sons' future in this Godforsaken country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Liberals have gone full circle and become...................................MUSLIMS!!!!!!


42 posted on 12/09/2013 4:27:27 AM PST by ZULU (Impeach that Bastard Barrack Hussein Obama the Doctor Mengele of Medical Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

A lot of Americans are too uninformed to recognize Helen Thomas, but based on their voting history, the American people believe nearly every word that came out of her mouth.


43 posted on 12/09/2013 4:42:38 AM PST by Theodore R. (The grand pooh-bahs are flirting with Christie, but it's Jebbie's turn!" to LOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

“Settled science” and “settled law” means the liberals win and can no longer be challenged. Maybe that’s why the two McC’s never challenge “settled law”.


44 posted on 12/09/2013 4:46:05 AM PST by Theodore R. (The grand pooh-bahs are flirting with Christie, but it's Jebbie's turn!" to LOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“She’s not naked. It’s art.”


45 posted on 12/09/2013 4:46:52 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
it's only if they don't like you... if they like you or want to hook up with you it's OK!

and what about showing all the cleavage, will that stop also? don't advertize for what you don't want

46 posted on 12/09/2013 4:52:38 AM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

47 posted on 12/09/2013 5:16:46 AM PST by Anton.Rutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

And as soon as the ‘rats’ finish implementing Sharia law the problem will go away as all females will be cloaked in black from head to foot.

...that will never ever happen in our culture...men will be blinded before women will have to wear unfashionable clothing...


48 posted on 12/09/2013 5:31:06 AM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Well I guess a universal Burqua law would take care of that. Hmmmm, they have that in some areas now, isn’t that Islam ???


49 posted on 12/09/2013 5:31:36 AM PST by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

They’ll have to pry my gazes from my cold dead eyes.


50 posted on 12/09/2013 5:33:59 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
...that will never ever happen in our culture...men will be blinded before women will have to wear unfashionable clothing...

Women dress for each other. Men are just bystanders in the parade.

51 posted on 12/09/2013 5:34:57 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It’s not that women object to men staring at their bodies. Women only object to MEN THEY ARE NOT ATTRACTED TO staring at their bodies. Many women get very offended when guys they consider “beneath” them display sexual interest in them, but NOT when a “hot” guy does.


52 posted on 12/09/2013 5:36:46 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corlorde

Shoot, I catch women checking me out all the time.

...yes, so do I...I can see the pity in their eyes...


53 posted on 12/09/2013 5:50:20 AM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

54 posted on 12/09/2013 5:55:42 AM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

My “feminist” SIL got really mad when I told this joke -

“You know what the difference is between ‘being asked out at work’ and ‘sexual harassment’? The attractiveness of the guy doing it.”


55 posted on 12/09/2013 5:56:16 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: twister881

Rush’s explanation of feminism
could apply to liberalism in general -

to make the unfit artificially “fit”.


56 posted on 12/09/2013 5:58:02 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

“In context”, he wasn’t checking her out.
He wouldn’t. He’s a gay Muslim.


57 posted on 12/09/2013 5:59:07 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kelly4c

Actually, there is much more to it than that. I refer you to “The Naked Ape” by Desmond Morris. Yes, men are hard wired and reproduction is the “primary” reason but not the only reason.


58 posted on 12/09/2013 5:59:54 AM PST by mistfree (Their & There, they're not the same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Helen Thomas was quite attractive when younger.

...actually, so was Hillary Clinton...time is so unkind to us...


59 posted on 12/09/2013 6:01:51 AM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kelly4c
Here’s what I don’t get though. It has been scientifically deduced that the male human is attracted to high waist/hip ratio, etc. because that signals fertility (propensity to bear healthy children) when in fact that’s not true.

You mean low waist/hip (or high hip/waist), ie waist less than hip.

And yes it is true:

Women with high WHR (0.80 or higher) have significantly lower pregnancy rates than women with lower WHRs (0.70–0.79), independent of their BMIs [48]. Therefore, it appears that the lower pregnancy rate in women with high WHR, compared to women with low WHR, is due to a problem with embryo development and its viability. Currently, there is no information available about the incidence or frequency of spontaneous abortion and WHR.

60 posted on 12/09/2013 6:02:06 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson