Posted on 12/04/2013 9:16:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
On a break from pretending to believe they live in a country bristling with violent white racists, the Non-Fox Media have been trying to debunk stories about the Knockout Game, in which young black males approach random strangers and try to knock them out with one punch.
The lefts leading line of defense against the Knockout Game is to argue that young black males have always been violent, so, hey, this is nothing new.
Youre welcome, black America!
In Slate, Emma Roller wearily recounted other episodes of black-on-white violence in order to announce: The Knockout Game is a myth.
Reminiscing about the flash mobs that shook many parts of the country a few years ago, Roller wrote: I remember the summer of 2011, a story about a crowd of (black) teenagers at the Wisconsin State Fair randomly attacking fairgoers went viral as a sign of a burgeoning race war.
So you see, stupid right-wingers, young black males have always been violent, so whats the big deal about the Knockout Game? Your honor, my clients not a killer; hes a serial killer.
MSNBCs Chris Hayes reached for a different example of monstrous black-on-white violence in order to dispute that the Knockout Game is anything new.
Looking like a translator for the deaf with all the air quotes he had to make for supposed trend and Knockout Game, Hayes compared it to what he called the fake trend of wilding after a mob of black youths violently attacked and raped a white woman jogging in New Yorks Central Park in 1989. According to Hayes, there never was such a thing as wilding....
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
Hand ups have been offered to many people in the underclass. Usually the hand is either slapped or ignored.
I think here your statement does not make sense, because giving a hand up is not merely offering a hand up, is it? Perhaps you have been offended by refusal of your personal offer, or that of your fraternal or religious organization? Give us an example of a hand up whose conditions are so degrading that it must be, and was, refused.
I’m not talking individual cases. Do you know how much money has been wasted on the dependent class in the last fifty years? It’s in the trillions. Johnson’s War On Poverty was designed to lift people out of poverty and start them on the road to a better life. The condition of most of those people is probably worse than before the start of the War On Poverty. The conclusion: handing out money and goodies to people with the aim of lifting them out of poverty doesn’t work. I doubt most of those people want to get off the dole. They like being handed other people’s money.
I'm not dismissing your thoughts, but could we leave this for another visit? With respect --
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.