Posted on 12/03/2013 11:06:15 AM PST by Red Badger
"Occupy Wall Street" asserts squatter's rights to single dad's home, gives it to "homeless" family
A previous article quoted an expert to the effect that adverse possession is the only authentic legal doctrine under which this could be done.
But to take title by adverse possession, in most states, the claimant must prove he has occupied the property continuously for something like 15 - 30 years (depending on the state).
“...only to come home and find a complete stranger living in your house”
Déjà vu! I thought we went through this already in the “white” house. Some stranger living there, cant seem to get rid of him, and all.
Ditto.
It’s too bad our society has litigated out the “punch in the mouth” solution...
Now, about all you can do with someone like this is let him get away with it or kill him.
Ordinarily, that wouldn’t be a fatal shot. However, in Mr. Carr’s case you would also hit his head.
Ah...I see Robert Carr is of a dark skin race...that means he is entitled to it. Case closed
a double tap is what is required. the mistake is using a half measure, when a full measure is required.
Spray him with 3” #7 buckshot from a keltec bull pup and turn him into a sieve.
He’ll seek medical help, go to the hospital and while he is out you can change the locks, move back in.
I’d get five rottweilers from East LA on the property STAT and place two PHALANX Gatling guns on the roof.
One on the NE corner, the other on the SW corner.
Then install Fort Knox doors on the front and back door.
Place two Claymores wherever someone can enter(remember to fsce them outward).
Should be good to go after that.
same thing happended in DC in 2008?
Apparently he has done this multiple times before
This is nonsense the person is engaged in trespass and fraud. Quiet Title does not give you the right to take someone else home, this person is going to go to jail for a long time.
This could have all been solved a long time ago with a simple scream of panic followed by some ventilation.
how does it get to this point. go to police and say my home, heres stuff with my address on it, this guy broke in. why is there even a discussion?
at common law, an adverse possession claim has several technical requirements and requires 20 years possession to ripen into a new ownership
(i do not know if Ohio has modified the rule or not, some states have lessened the 20 years requirement for instance...)
So where are the cops throwing this thief in jail? Carr isn’t a renter. This isn’t just a civil case. He destroyed this families property and took their home.
They need a better lawyer cause this is still ongoing.
Prior to shooting him we'd have to have a little talk about where he took my possessions.
Say hello to my little friend......................
Entitlement. Notice something about the criminal? Have anything to do with a “gibs me dat” mentality? Have anything to do with an eeevvvviiiilllll ‘oppressor’ and an innocent ‘oppressed’ person walking in and taking what is ‘rightfully’ his?
The fact that the police did not arrest him for breaking-and-entering, I would say there is more here than meets the eye.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.