Nothing like trying to derail a thread.
On the contrary: his remark was on point.
Why do the ROE for the police LESS strict than for the troops?
US police can anally delve an innocent man for nine hours, or bulldoze a house and shoot an unarmed man.
US troops - on the other hand - are barely allowed to shoot back if fired upon.
Do you disagree that the ROE on our troops is too restrictive?