I’m not a “sport”. A professional with a considerable bit of knowledge about this, and in no way do I need to tell myself anything. What I’ve told you is well-established in forensic criminal investigation. All the laws of physics are in place and being obeyed, in everything I describe, aided by muscular and neural reflex. Single sourcing the concept of head movement from a “movie of official reference” is the first error of the lay public, which does provide significant profits for the leftist conspiracy nuts.
To the extent anyone wants to satisfy themselves beyond an emotional need to believe anything but what has been examined generationally, with exponential increases in technical knowledge yielding the same conclusion- a single skilled lone shooter and three shots (cause of death one FMJ rifle round to the cranium) — there are serious scholarly works in this area available in major medical journals of forensics. Most of the mystery about this death was caused by RFK controlling the autopsy, trying to protect JFK’s “other” medical conditions (to include incurable gonnorhea and Addison’s disease which had destroyed his adrenal glands). A conspiracy?- Castro had a very good reason to “help” this lone commie psycho with limited resources, assisted by Marcello (who was pissed at the US for being deported and copped the Castro assassination program to the Cubans in retaliation). A better question is that if the FBI had photos of oswald at/in the Russian embassy in Mexico City and were following him— why did they not house arrest him to be safe prior?
As I have heard before, people see the shots like in a war movie or Western. It doesn’t always work that way and we’ve seen people get shot a million times on TV.
Per your earlier post mentioning I believe a watermelon, people should envision say shooting a pumpkin on a post from 60 yards. How it is going to react is not that predictable. It could do a few things. And the physics may not be that open and shut.
Too, fragments were found on the President’s brain, the bullet may “defrag” so to speak rather than what I said explosion. There is real gun terminology in such debate.
At the least, it is clear that a shooting is not going to always happen as we might see it on TV.
I don't need a so-called 'expert' to explain what I've seen with my own two eyes. Especially when said 'expert' is trying to convince me that the simple display of physics I've just witnessed was caused by a force which runs exactly opposite to the known laws of the universe.
What you're selling sounds precisely like the doublespeak libs have been thrusting down our throats for generations:
"Your health care plan wasn't cancelled - it was upgraded!"
Utter bs.