Just one more....HIDDEN IN PLAIN VIEW: The Zapruder Film and the Shot that Missed

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/scearce.htm ^ | November 27th, 2007 | Kenneth R. Scearce

[John S Mosby]

Mathematical truisms prove a conspiracy killed JFK. This is beyond comment. There is no “math” that would prove a conspiracy. There must be evidence, corroborated. Numerous examples exist of govt. conspiracies proven and come to light.
Good Lord, we are headed to what in jurisprudence? Well, we’re there.
Bye bye. It’s been 50 years.

[John S Mosby]

So, Marksman is minimal, what is the top rating (in your understanding)? And if you were or are a shooter of a margninal kind of experience you would know this rating. What is your military rating rating in firearms? Do tell.

The waste FRiend is reading the ravings of the illiterate masses who have nothing but garbage for differential thought, but spout bile anyway. History is full of them, pontificating and “editing”. LOL. bye. Deo Vindice.

[editor-surveyor]

Had you exceeded the basic standards, you might have been rated “Expert.”

[BeadCounter]

I saw someone bring up a “reasonable question”, JFK wore that back brace, looks really like a sort of girdle. You can see a picture of the shirt he wore all bloody but as to blood on that Ace (brand) back brace, there would be some question. I had never considered this before, interesting.

http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/medical/brace.jpg
http://www.dailyjfk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/JFK-back-brace.jpg

[politicianslie]

There is no “math” that would prove a conspiracy.

That is not true.

There are two completely independent ways to determine the time between shots in the JFK assassination. If the times between shots are the same using both ways, that means probabilities can be determined using math. Even a high school student should comprehend that.

I show in this video that the times between shots are the same for the last few shots. Either the laws of probability were suspended when JFK was shot OR a conspiracy killed JFK. Americans have been taught to watch and accept, not review and think. It is very easy to tell huge lies to most Americans.

SOLVING THE UNSOLVABLE

[politicianslie]

You can see a picture of the shirt he wore all bloody but as to blood on that Ace (brand) back brace

JFK was shot, rushed to Parkland and his clothes were removed within a few minutes. The blood would have to have soaked through his coat and his shirt in just a few minutes.

It does bring up an interesting point though. I wonder if their is another bullet hole in the back brace too? Dale Myers in his computer animated cartoon of the assassination (made popular on the 40th anniversary by an ABC news documentary) attempted to explain the unexplainable by moving the shirt and suit up his back. No one with an IQ even approaching room temperature should ever believe that a bullet could hit 5.5 inches below JFK's collar, go up and exit his neck and then go down to pass through John Connally. It is obviously impossible.

The picture of the back of JFK's shirt showed a bullet hole about 5 inches below his collar

Myers' computer cartoon bunched up the shirt and jacket toward JFK's neck

The computer cartoon then showed the bullet going down at an angle to hit Connally in the back, something that is obviously impossible.

If the US government's Single Bullet Guess didn't happen, then what did? There is a way to prove that an alternate scenario is true. By taking the two ways that can be used to determine the time between shots and showing they are the same, that statistically proves a conspiracy killed JFK!

If the US government obviously lied, then no reasonable person would use any of the information or evidence supplied by the US government! Conspirators in the US government with immense power are the only ones who could have pulled this off. Why can this be right and everything else be wrong? It's because everyone else accepts most everything the US Government held as evidence as valid. The video proves the US government lied and forged to hide the truth.

There is a way to prove a conspiracy killed JFK

Some of the information in this video is corrected for "ommissions by others. If you simply accept information from others and you do not understand the basis, you will get wrong answers as others have. If you take the time to understand that this is true, you can then easily prove to yourself that the US government lied and forged evidence. Then it is a short distance to knowing who the scoundrels were that killed JFK.

[BeadCounter]

Most people agree, especially if you are a man, Lee Harvey Oswald had an ideally beautiful wife in Marina, heck, Russian Mail Brides are often beautiful, kind of amazing.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Interloper-Harvey-Oswald-Inside/dp/0465021816

The author of this book surmises Lee had a lot of turbulence inside, tried to stab relatives I believe when he was around 14 years old, seemed to go through a series of jobs, often looking for jobs, apparently had some problem with spousal abuse with Marina though I don’t know if the Cops were ever called. We know he told off that FBI man, “leave my wife alone” and did it while in custody with the Dallas Cops.

This might be what all this is about, his psychological state as much as his political opinions, okay, Walker Oswald was probably adverse to but JFK??

[BeadCounter]

I think there is a good chance, Oswald did this for similar reasons John Hinckley tried to kill Reagan, they did it for gee, how do I say this, to try to impress women, Hinckley was trying to impress Jodi Foster.

This was in a recent NewsMax:

“Oswald Friend Paul Gregory: JFK’s Killer Acted Alone

Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he killed President John F. Kennedy in a bid to make his mark in the world and impress his scorn-filled wife, Marina, says Paul Gregory, whose family were friends of the assassin.”

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/NewsmaxTv/Lee-Harvey-Oswald-John-FKennedy-Marina-Oswald-assassin/2013/11/13/id/536517#ixzz2mCKHmKiI
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

---

And my prior post about that book “The Interloper” seems to draw the same kinds of conclusions.

I could be wrong but it seems very plausible.

[nikos1121]

That’s all you have?

Wasn’t there a police motorcycle with its radio on that captured the sound of gun fire?

[BeadCounter]

Here’s a real good page, at least in my opinion.

http://oswald.jfkassassination.net/shots.htm

House Select Committee on Assassinations,

47% ear-witnesses heard gunshots from Texas Schoolbook Depository Building

20% ear-witnesses heard gunshots from Grassy Knoll

29% ear-witnesses heard gunshots from “Other”

4% ear-witnesses heard gunshots from “Two Directions”

I think the last stat is especially significant because that means 96% think at a minimum, the gunshots come from one direction, highly in favor of the lone gunman thesis. (Let alone, for the record, almost half hear the gunshots from the Texas Schoolbook Depository Building)

---

Next Stat, number of gunshots is on that webpage as well:

81% say 3 gunshots, under 3 gunshots, 12%, 4 or more gunshots heard by only 5%.

---

These two stats totally sink the multiple-gunman theory. Now, I am open minded but I do say, at least in regards to the witnesses themselves, the Oliver Stone/Jim Garrison/Jim Marrs scenario does not seem plausible.