Posted on 11/23/2013 8:30:47 PM PST by ReaganÜberAlles
A newly published theory (2007) about the Kennedy assassination demands that we re-examine the Zapruder film, more closely than ever before.
Sure— the CIA/Mafia/WASP aristocracy/Masons/Shriners/ Illuminati did it. No, FRiend— a psychopathic/sociopathic very little man with great communist ideals and a deep hatred— who wanted to BE somebody— that’s who did it. And all the BS theories posited over the years is a full time industry. One cannot provide “motive, means and opportunity” as the justifying “proof” that a conspiracy existed. The facts have to be there— and the 50 plus facts of Oswald’s actions/reactions/interrogation/physical evidence all point to one man. A lot of people wanted Kennedy dead, and if any of these “groups” did it, over 50 years later not ONE person within the conspiracy can corroborate (other than to line their pockets with the “I was there” false reality for their 15 minutes of fame or full time BS employment). Occam’s Razor supported by facts and evidence. LBJ was a true slime ball pol and moral decadent. While “way above him” might be posited there exists no evidence whatsoever (Oliver Stone entertains and incorporates ALL the groups who were “above LBJ” in his farcical film).
Or much smarter than you will ever know, having made your mind up, like many here that “eyes never lie”. Facts are sticky commodities unrelieved by the emotional predetermination and need to ignore them. Deo Vindice.
Not for the first time have FReepers reminded, through their postings, of how came to learn about this site. By first experience it was during the Bush v. Gore recount, overhearing a woman discussing having gone to Ft. Marcy park specifically to lay down in the depression in the ground where Vince Foster was found dead with his antique Civil War pistol in hand— to lay down there and “feel the vibrations” to determine the “real story” (ie. a whacko of certifiable first order). Countered by the other party in the discussion asking about Free Republic’s website. While still useful as a political barometer and information bulletin- it is threads such as this one which re-enforce the need for strong logic and qualitative analysis in the face of sheer ignorance of facts. Versus say,going to Dealey Plaza and searching for vibrations with Jesse Ventura and “conspiracy theory” nutjobs. As a professional in a dwindling conservative universe, it is depressing to read these posts.
Please open your eyes, and turn on what little cognition you have.
JFK was a huge speed bump to the global bankers that ordered his removal “with extreme prejudice.”
Now that's creepy.
Not believing all the conspiracy nut job theories about JFK's assassination doesn't come anywhere near that. Most of those people deserve a badge for sanity and thoughtfulness, considering the multiple holes in and the lack of evidence for each theory.
Am well aware of that. Don’t assume, FRiend. It was greenbacks that helped get him killed in the mix. Whether they did it or not— that is in dispute. Kennedy would have been oh so much better that the pig LBJ and millions of generational teat suckers.
The blind, physiologically and neurologically have proven cognition. The “eyes” are not enough, FRiend. Respectfully, as you have no idea what cognition I have. Commentary of this sort makes for a rather weak “cognitive” argument, and usually the harbinger of a lost argument.
Quite familiar with Presidents fighting the “Bank”. Jackson being one who was successful in doing so, and said to have been targeted— he shot the dude. Certainly support the idea that the banks created the political atmosphere (since they love socialism) that inspired a kook. But a kook did it, and no meds needed to restrain the paranoia perpetuated by conspiracy pumpers.
JFK was taken out by professionals, not by your ‘kook.’
The killing shot entered his forehead, and exited the back, carrying most of his brain with it. Your kook shot from behind, if he shot at all.
Now that Gerald Ford is dead, we have no one to prosecute for the cover-up, but the truth has a way of refreshing the air.
>> “Sure— the CIA/Mafia/WASP aristocracy/Masons/Shriners/ Illuminati did it.” <<
.
You’re ‘certifiable.’
Name calling? Tell you what— you show me a photo of the the entry wound from the front— fired from the “grassy knoll”, which would be a shot from the right, and an angle (any angle from there)creating the resulting damage to the left hemisphere of the brain on exit— and I’ll believe you. There isn’t any but this should not stop fantasists. Further you go ahead and state how many autopsies you’ve attended including cranial section and/or gunshot wounds to the head.
No, FRiend not certifiable, I’m quite diagnostic of the more than 100 certifiable conspiracy frauds foisted on the public in this 50 year old case. Each with no more facts than stating “motive, means and opportunity” and no factual evidence to support. It is a board game at this point and full employment for leftist causes who cannot and will not accept the facts, and the utter simplicity of what horribly happened.
Gerald Ford? Arlen Specter? Allen Dulles? the Libs darling Chief Justice Earl Warren?
Yes he did shoot from behind— and connected twice, the second time blowing the top off the Presidents head. Many, many photos— or, are those contrived by this cabal?
The attending physician has described both the front and rear wounds in detail. Have you bothered to digest his comments?
Exit wounds blow things away, not entry wounds.
You are obviously not an experienced shooter, or if you are then you are a deliberate liar. Which is it?
Ross Perot said the Cubans did it. That clinches it for me as one of 100 possible actuators of the event./s
Yep, dodging the question!
Change the subject as many times as you have to.
Read for content, FRiend— Here it is again including the words “entry wound” and “exit” (the words “on exit” capitalized):
“.. you show me a photo of the the entry wound from the front— fired from the “grassy knoll”, which would be a shot from the right, and an angle (any angle from there)creating the resulting damage to the left hemisphere of the brain ON EXIT— and I’ll believe you. There isn’t any but this should not stop fantasists. Further you go ahead and state how many autopsies you’ve attended including cranial section and/or gunshot wounds to the head.”
35 years a hunter. Rated Marksman USMC, and holder of CMP Distinguished Marksman Badge. Former NRA instructor. Pathologist (human)and biochemist (human and agricultural), w/ training under the internationally noted forensic anthropologist William R. Maples, PhD. (who ID’d the Romanov family among other high profile cases)
Info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_R._Maples
Assuredly understand the effects of entry and exit wounds, FRiend. Professionally trained and experienced in differential diagnosis and forensic analysis. Company founder/owner- Consultant.
You?
Done here. Family calls.
IOW, you’re here to deflect and deceive.
What a waste!
>> “Rated Marksman” <<
Pretty much minimum, no surprise.
I agree with you, too many farfetched stories, in vogue now is to blame LBJ.
Banking Cartel? This talks about it, http://americanfreepress.net/?p=13765 I am not too aware of who these people are.
And one can find all kinds of stuff, the Mossad of all things being involved in the JFK assassination? Guarantee if you look for it, you will find some saying so.
In fact, good taste keeps me from posting furthermore.
Patricia Ann Donaldson says Bam-Bam
James Tague says the Crack-Crack of two rifle shots
I have seen quite a few of the witnesses say BANG-BANG, Crack-Crack which indicates they thought the last two shots were fired a split second apart. There is a significant subset of the people who say they only heard three shots who thought the last two shots were fired a split second apart.
Here is what you have: If the audio evidence is valid, and 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds proves it is, then that means a significant amount of the evidence provided by US government is forged.
Consistent with the many witnesses who say they heard BANG-BANG is the audio evidence which also indicates the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG. You may not find it believable, I know this doesn't pass the smell test, but as you and others think about it, it will finally start to make sense and the biggest lie in history will die a rapid death. One day you'll realize (for example) that a hole in the back of JFK's shirt 5 inches below the collar proved that the bullet could not have emerged from the front JFK's neck and then gone down to hit Connally in the back. Just because the gubermint lied to you does not mean you should believe it.
I assume you have never had a sensitive classified position in your career. You know, where the government does things and hundreds of people know it but the truth never sees the light of day. If I went into detail on my experiences, how many years would I get?
The things I have posted are not hand waving arguments about someone would have talked (or not). They are mathematical truisms that proves that a conspiracy killed JFK.
What is the probability that the times between shots in the Zapruder film are the same as the times between shots in the analysis of the Dallas police radio acoustical evidence? Either the laws of probability were repealed the day JFK was shot or else, you have been lied to.
I realize most Americans can't balance their checkbook without a calculator. I don't expect many to understand or believe this, it is not something that the average person can wrap their fingers around, BUT, given time, more and more will understand that the BANG-BANG last two shots scenario makes sense and the government lies are and always have been BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.