Skip to comments.
Warning All Churches [Homosexual infiltration]
Worldview Weekend ^
| October 27, 2013
| Ken Ham
Posted on 11/21/2013 1:41:36 PM PST by fwdude
Over this year, there have been a number of news reports on another movement in the church advocating for the acceptance of homosexual behavior and same-sex relationships. Matthew Vines, an openly homosexual 23-year-old student at Harvard University, posted a video on YouTube of a speech he gave on homosexuality and the Bible. In the talk, he claims repeatedly that Gods Word does not condemn monogamous same-sex relationships.
Now, a recent report from the Christian Post highlighted the amount of compromise happening within the church on this issue. The headline of the article explains, " 50 Hand-Picked Christians Trained To Convince Churches To Re-Interpret Scriptures Gay Boundaries. Vines apparently hosted a training conference recently in his home state of Kansas for Christians who want to convince their churches to accept same-sex relationships.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldviewweekend.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: falseteacher; heretic; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: papertyger
You are the one who appears to be arguing for Christ not being God in the flesh. That contradicts Scripture, so please be my guest (just for “grins and giggles” you know).
41
posted on
11/21/2013 6:49:52 PM PST
by
JLLH
To: JLLH
This is a common misconception by Catholics as they think equate it with some private interpretation unauthorized by Scripture, contradictory to Scripture and unverifiable which is patent nonsense. Then why is there no universally accepted Protestant doctrine of Baptism?
42
posted on
11/21/2013 6:50:34 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: papertyger
Because it is only symbolic and regeneration does not hinge upon it. Most follow Christ’s example (again, found in Scripture, which Catholicism loves to pretend it invented.)
43
posted on
11/21/2013 6:52:05 PM PST
by
JLLH
To: JLLH
John 1:1 and Genesis provide answers to any argument for polytheism. Unfortunately, it seems you can't.
44
posted on
11/21/2013 6:53:54 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: JLLH
Ever get tired of that one-trick pony act? Guess when you dont really have an argument....As if "Scriptural Tourette's" is an argument....
45
posted on
11/21/2013 6:55:18 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: papertyger
Scripture does. That’s my argument. Sorry it’s apparently beyond your comprehension. Sad.
46
posted on
11/21/2013 6:56:28 PM PST
by
JLLH
To: JLLH
which from one of your previous posts appears to be something with which you agree on....remember what I said earlier about the Protestant penchant for accusation?
47
posted on
11/21/2013 6:56:53 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: papertyger
Ah, yes, the eternal Catholic hissy fit thrown when Scripture is used. Guess it’s to be expected when one doesn’t know Scripture and cannot answer arguments from a Biblical view. Again, sad, but completely within your power to change.
48
posted on
11/21/2013 6:57:39 PM PST
by
JLLH
To: papertyger
See your own words, post 36.
49
posted on
11/21/2013 6:58:34 PM PST
by
JLLH
To: JLLH
Actually, Scripture states that believers are given the Holy Spirit for guidance.Where does it say believers are compelled to follow that guidance?
50
posted on
11/21/2013 6:58:54 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: JLLH
51
posted on
11/21/2013 7:00:01 PM PST
by
narses
(... unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.)
To: JLLH
Jesus said to them again, Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I send you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and said to them, Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.
52
posted on
11/21/2013 7:00:27 PM PST
by
narses
(... unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.)
To: papertyger
So.... your position is that the Holy Spirit is an optional buffet item?? The Holy Spirit indwells the believer. No HOly Spirit, no salvation.
53
posted on
11/21/2013 7:01:37 PM PST
by
JLLH
To: JLLH
Scripture condemns those who add to it, attempting to create their own authority...Again, the assumption Scripture is the only authority. Please demonstrate that from Scripture.
54
posted on
11/21/2013 7:02:17 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: narses
Your pictures in lieu of solid argument are entertaining but really add nothing to the discussion.
55
posted on
11/21/2013 7:02:37 PM PST
by
JLLH
To: JLLH
You are the one who appears to be arguing for Christ not being God in the flesh.Making it personal?
56
posted on
11/21/2013 7:03:23 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: JLLH
Because it is only symbolic and regeneration does not hinge upon it. According to which Protestant denominations? There are others that fully embrace Baptismal Regeneration.
57
posted on
11/21/2013 7:04:56 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: JLLH
Actually, Scripture states that believers are given the Holy Spirit for guidance.
Joh 15:26 “But I will send you the Advocatethe Spirit of truth. He will come to you from the Father and will testify all about Me.
It would appear the Spirit’s major job is to point to Jesus?
I have heard some sermons say if we are talking about the spirit and not Jesus, it ain’t the Spirit.
To: JLLH
Scripture does. Thats my argument. Sorry its apparently beyond your comprehension. So demonstrate it.
59
posted on
11/21/2013 7:08:10 PM PST
by
papertyger
("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
To: papertyger
Happy to do so — Here you go:
2 Timothy
Deut. 4:2
Prov. 30:5-6
Rev. 22:18
for starters....
60
posted on
11/21/2013 7:08:46 PM PST
by
JLLH
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson