Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donmeaker

Yes, typically they are. However, if you go look at the definition and derivation of the word “soldier” you will find it has several meanings, in fact. The derivation is from France circa 1300...essentially “service for pay”.

I used the word in the context of serving ones country in an armed capacity; that applies to other forms of service and specialties that directly or indirectly support armed operations. In my book, they are all ‘soldiers’.

Lastly, I think that there are several special units from both the Navy and the Air Force that would bristle at the thought of not being a ‘soldier’. The SEALs are one, Air Force Special Operations is another (you know the guys that ride in on camels and donkeys to light up a target for the GBUs) - there are many other such units.


52 posted on 11/14/2013 5:34:01 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

The few SEALS I know are certain they are sailors.

Roman marines got paid half the wages of the Roman soldier.


55 posted on 11/14/2013 7:13:23 AM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

A soldier is one who fights as part of an organized land-based armed force;

per wikipedia.

Now some would argue the AF doesn’t qualify because of organization, not its land base, but I wouldn’t go that far.


57 posted on 11/14/2013 7:23:22 AM PST by donmeaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson