Posted on 11/13/2013 8:46:16 AM PST by traumer
So few people have enrolled in Obamacare that desperate Democrats have stooped to launching a war on women with demeaning and sexist ads.
The latest marketing campaign implies that young women would only be interested in Colorado's government-run health care exchange if they get coverage for birth control pills to have sex with strange men. The most offensive ad shows a 20-something woman named “Susie” holding a packet of birth control pills with an open-mouth, wide smile. She is wearing a flesh-colored, low-cut, sleeveless top, tight skinny jeans and open-toed black heels.
Susie is leaning against “Nate,” who is wearing an untucked shirt with the top four buttons undone to show his hairy chest. He has a smirk on his face and one hand in the pocket of his jeans.
“OMG, he’s hot!,” Susie is shown saying. “Let’s hope he’s as easy to get as this birth control. My health insurance covers the pill, which means all I have to worry about is getting him between the covers.”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Making fun of Obamacare is a form of bullying.
Your parody should be reported to AttachWatch.com.
Young liberal women are sluts.. Sandra Fluke comes to mind needing $3000 for condoms.
.......
“Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy (Georgetown student insurance not covering contraception), Fluke reported.
It costs a female student $3,000 to have protected sex over the course of her three-year stint in law school, according to her calculations.
“Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,” Fluke told the hearing.
$3,000 for birth control in three years? That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex – and, she wants us to pay for it.
WTF- this isn’t a parody??
Come on-
Next we’ll have honey-boo boo get FREE anti Gas pills?
Crack pipe users getting their teeth fixed?
we are doomed
Ahem.
This is pandering to his second-most-reliable voter base: stupid, liberal women.
Fixed it for you.
doyougotinsurance.com
:o)
I saw them....I have no words.
are these posters real? seriously?
And yet even the ad acknowledges that it’s not consequence-free. A program (Obamacare) that is supposedly intended to be concerned about health tells these women they’re on their own when it comes to disease prevention; all Obamacare funds is PREGNANCY prevention. The possible creation of a child is a more serious “health” matter to these people than potentially fatal STD’s.
All in all, these ads show what the Obama folks think of young people: They’re gullible animals and the most important thing for society is to keep them from procreating while they are emboldened to spread amongst themselves the diseases that will kill them off.
Nate looks like a Gitmo escapee...and is probably about as trustworthy. Just sayin’.
Rush is ripping this to shreds.
Gag....
Tragically, yes.
There is no effin' way that "Nora" is surviving on Ramen Noodles. Alexis wouldn't be considered "gangly", either.
I was debating about saying exactly what you did ;-) You’re right. The moral climate is such that for many (NOT ALL!) the lifestyle shown in these ads is not only tolerated, but it’s what young women aspire to. If anyone doubts this, just watch MTV or even network TV for a few hours....
“Girls just wanna have fu-un”, right?
AIEEEEE!!!!!
When the gov’t encourages people to engage in promiscuous activity, and citizens must pay for both the advertisement and the insurance costs, we have crossed the line between church and state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.