AKA left-wing libertarian. I don’t know how many times history has demonstrated that you cannot have real freedom without responsibility. If people cannot discipline themselves, then the police will do it for them. That is inevitable.
If people choose to be gay, let them do it off privately somewhere, not impose it on everyone down to kindergarteners.
If people want unlimited rights to abortion, let them . . . No, sorry, there is no right to kill or enslave people because they are convenient. And, contrary to what they say, it’s the same statist Democrats who supported slavery who now support baby killing and euthanasia of the old and inconvenient.
That’s not freedom. Or, if you like, it’s freedom for me, but not for thee.
The main thing about libertarianism that appeals to me is its neo-isolationism, its reluctance to get America involved in foreign wars and nation-building.
If socially liberal libertarians think they’re going to win on a platform of drugs and porn, good luck. The Democrats already have a handle on immorality, and the resulting wrecks will never, ever vote for smaller government. The Democrats, of course, know this.
“Leftist Libertarians” want their cake of freedom and they wanna eat it too via freebies...
You cannot have BOTH...
Freedom is NOT inversely proportional to Responsibility.
If you want 100 units of freedom you MUST bear the weight of 100 units of Responsibility for YOURSELF. You cannot pawn off the Responsibility onto the masses because once you do that it destroys personal freedom...
Freedom IS the Inverse of Freebies....
The more Freebies, the less freedom one has....
The guy hasn’t noticed that the gay agenda is to accumulate governmental power for itself. The ENDA law, for instance, aims not at ending discrimination but at suppressing all public opposition to their behavior.