Posted on 11/04/2013 2:30:50 AM PST by markomalley
In response to the partisan bickering that exists between President Obama and his political adversaries over things like the budget, Obamacare, and immigration reform, the question raised by many observers is: Why would Obama be willing to negotiate with Iran, but not the GOP?
As it turns out, the answer to that question may have more to do with the president's and Iran's like-minded feelings toward America than Obama's desire to exert his influence on behalf of global harmony.
After all, based on the damage inflicted in just five short years, it's possible that Barack Hussein Obama is better suited to march alongside the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution than sit in the Oval Office.
The president's willingness to participate in nuclear talks with a nation that has expressed genocidal contempt for Israel as well as a desire to eradicate America from the face of the earth is curious indeed, especially when measured against his obstinacy in political debate here at home.
The "Conquest of the American spy den" is another name for the Iranian hostage crisis where 52 Americans were held captive for 444 days after a group of Iranian students overtook the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.
(snip)
Moreover, notwithstanding Iran's general ill will directed toward the West, here at home our ever-eager-to-negotiate 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner seems to have fewer problems with threats of nuclear obliteration than he does with the Marine Corps wearing masculine headgear and the Navy SEALS sharing a Navy Jack "Don't Tread on Me" logo with the Tea Party.
As sinister as it sounds, could it be that Barack Obama secretly concurs with Iran's view of "oppressive and untrustworthy" America?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
He’s not even being very “secret” about it.
Iran:
F**k you, death to America!
Obama:
OK, so we have our differences. I'll lift those sanctions even though it means death to the Israelis, Saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians, Kuwaitis, the Emirates, Iraq, Lebanon and other US allies.
Iran:
F**k you! death to Obama!
Obama:
C’mon guys, I know you don't mean it. We'll let you enrich Uranium to 50% if you want. How's that?
Iran:
F**k you! We will kill all of you “Big Satans”.
Obama:
Gee wiz guys, c’mon let's be friends...
So Mr. & Mrs. liberal (either openly or hiding as a RINO), your vote in either of the two elections helped destroy this Nation and all that has been created since the 1700’s. You’ve plunged a knife in the heart of life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness. You’ve helped cultivate greed, selfishness and lack of respect to our fellow citizens to a level never seen before in this Nation or any Nation. Thanks for nothing!
It was a major campaign issue in election 2008.
Obama said that he would negotiate, without preconditions, with Iran. McCain criticized Obama for that statement.
Henry Kissinger(plus 4 other republican ex-secretaries of state), who was a paid consultant to the McCain campaigned, publicly praised Obama at the time and Obama used that Kissinger endorsement in the campaign debate with McCain.
You can find the video on YouTube.
This is a foreign policy doctrine issue. Republican Realists versus Republican NeoCons. Obama campaigned on a Realist foreign policy and McCain campaigned on a NeoCon foreign policy.
Iran gets ‘wee-weed up’ every November 4 for “Death to America Day”. I wonder where Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett will be celebrating this year. ObamaCare is certainly bringing death to Americans, so they have that going for them.
Murderous islamist.
“Realist” does not mean unconditional, pre-announced “negotiations” that can have only one Iranian-favorable conclusion.
Sorry, but this one really can’t be pinned on the Republicans, as much as everyone here likes to ignore the Dems and go after various GOPers as the source of all ills.
Obama is going way beyond anything he even announced, and Kerry, for some reason, seems to realize that the ME is a complex place and that Bambi simply can’t dump the rest of the powers there in his desire to be head of the New Caliphate (which is how I think he sees himself, and he now believes that Iran will give him this power).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.