[Sgt_Schultze]

A stealth democrat

[Paine in the Neck]

I would hazard a guess that if you dug deep enough you would find Sarvis is getting significant financial support - or promises of future support - from the Soros crowd.

[Old Retired Army Guy]

Sarvis is being financed by Democrats to siphon votes away from Cuccinelli. People who vote for Sarvis might as well be voting for McAuliffe.

[Qbert]

Here’s some good factual information on this LINO:

http://news.heartland.org/editorial/2013/10/28/virginia-gubernatorial-candidate-robert-sarvis-libertarian-name-only

[Dead Corpse]

Another Bob Barr type LP candidate. You know you’ve lost your libertarian “street cred” when the Paul’s endorse the GOP-er in the race.

Dems are following the template though. Push favorable polling data through their lapdog media, bury your opponent under Alynski-type attacks, muddy the waters as much as possible so no one notices that heavily Dem precincts have 108% “over votes” and absentee ballots are only counted for the Dem while being “lost” for anyone else.

That’s how we ended up with Franken and Dayton up here in MN.

For those blaming the LP candidate as a “spoiler”, go sit in the corner until you realize the LP draws pretty evenly from both sides.

[Beagle8U]

Scratch a Liberaltarian and you will find liberal that would vote for Karl Marx if you promised him a big sack of dope to smoke with his queer boyfriend!

[cdcdawg]

Sounds like Sarvis is actually a moderate Republican running on the Libertarian label.

[familyop]

Support for vices and slavery require big, fascist government and cost big tax bucks.

[ansel12]

Also there’s his positions on social issues. On abortion, he’s actually to the left of Democrats on this. After the Kermit Gosnell case the VA General Assembly passed by a wide margin new restrictions on abortion clinics making sure they weren’t health hazards. Even Democrats supported the measure by pretty good margins. Sarvis says he favors rolling them back which would only risk creating another Kermit Gosnell situation. While I personally disagree with pro-choice libertarians, I can at least accept their viewpoint. Sarvis however goes too far. On gay marriage, Sarvis favors legalizing it which isn’t truly libertarian. The true libertarian position is to get government out of the marriage business as reflected by Ron Paul.

What a crock.

The libertarian position on abortion is ZERO restrictions, ZERO restraints, ZERO limits, their position is that is is purely whatever the woman wants, whenever she wants. *""we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.""*

On the gay agenda here is their position, *""Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. ""* Which is simply childish and rejects all human experience as all cultures have had to define marriage and have laws related to marriage, whether law was tribal law or some other form of government, or even a governmental type church law, in America marriage laws have always existed, as they must.

[Impy]

He’s exposed, that’s a Bill Maher “liberatrian” right there. But is it too late?

Let’s go Cuccinelli/Jackson/Obenshain!

[Seattle Conservative]

Another article from today:

Sarvis a Libertarian? Nope
The Virginia gubernatorial candidate is a social liberal.

ByCharles C. W. Cooke
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/362690/sarvis-libertarian-nope-charles-c-w-cooke