Same thing. No magical other definitions exist in the minds of 99% of people. I say again, this junk hasn't gotten rid of Obama so using it against Cruz is like stabbing yourself in the eye for no reason. It's time to let it go my friend.
Seems like we may have had this little discussion before, and I kind of expected someone to bring it up.
If 99% of people are so darn ignorant that they can't understand the meaning of an important term in the Constitution (the supreme law of the land), the Constitutional republic called the United States of America has no hope for survival.
Let me quote Theodore Roosevelt again: "No man is above the law!" The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. So Ted Cruz, despite his noteworthy attributes as a man and as a public official, is not above the law as it currently exists. Therefore, barring a constitutional amendment, he is, through no fault of his own, ineligible to be POTUS or VPOTUS.
As for Obama, he too is constitutionally ineligible as well, in all probability, although until we see a bona fide BC of his, we'll never know with 100% certainty. Obama is in all likelihood a usurper of the office, but that travesty doesn't ipso facto make Ted Cruz constitutionally eligible.