Wanna bet?
That is nothing more than your personal viewpoint.
There is nothing “out there” that establishes it as legitimate Constitutional law or statutory law or even sound reason.
The bottom line is Ted Cruz did not have to be naturalized into being a citizen because he was a citizen by birth born to an American citizen mother which is established under what controlling authority there is and has not been dis-established or overturned.
And if you want to try riding this horse here, remember that JR has said he will not allow his site to become one that decends into that.
Because he believes and has so stated that Ted Cruz is a natural born citizen as the son of a natural born citizen mother. And by natural born, meaning a citizen by birth and not having to be naturalized.
BORN a citizen.
“That is nothing more than your personal viewpoint.”
That is a false accusation. It was the statements of an American Law Review article supposedly authored by the same legal scholar Chief Justice Gray relied upon in his fraudulent Wong Kim Ark decision.
Would you be opposed to a court ruling in which the original meaning of “natural born citizen” was interpreted and clearly stated so that everybody knows what the legally binding definition is and the goalpost cannot be moved depending on whose eligibility is being challenged at the time?