I refuse to let you stuff something in my mouth that I didn't say. It's pretty dishonest of you to imply that I'm defending attacks on Ted Cruz, when I've said the exact opposite on this thread.
For the record, I'm a Texan who voted for Ted Cruz in the general and the run-off election last year. I couldn't be happier with his service to the people so far.
My position is that freedom includes the right to discuss any subject, no matter how unpalatable. What position one takes on a subject is a different matter, and yes, some opinions are unwanted (and even verboten) on this site.
I've been here a long time, and those who know me, know that I'm fully in accord with FR's mission. I don't agree with the left, and take every opportunity to express that here, and elsewhere.
See my post 75 for further explanation of where I'm coming from.
You are the one that summed up people saying Cruz is not fit to run as “communication”. That’s BS propaganda to attempt to categorize such attempts at FUD against Cruz as “communication”. Hell, everything is communications.
Thank you, I feel the same way - that we should be able to discuss and dissent. I like Cruz, but the hysterical defensiveness about him on FR is troubling to me. It’s how the Dems function.
My position is that our presidential candidate needs to be strong politically and have absolutely no murkyness in his background - it shouldn’t be possible to even have a conversation about his origins, etc because there should be nothing that could provoke a question.