“In your view he;s run a crap campaign so it’s a case of you thinking you won’t vote for him.”
In part, yes. His campaign is crap not because it’s being incompetently run (which it is), but because it has caused KC to stray away from conservative ideas. While actions matter more than words, words DO matter as well. If in the heat of campaign scrutiny you’re not willing to stick to your ideals, then what does that say about you?
I’m not playing footsie with weak-kneed gop candidates anymore. We have one of those in Richmond right now. Much to my regret I voted for the tax hiking, ethically challenged wastrel. If I don’t vote for the gop candidate this time out of an excess of caution then so be it.
As for “their agenda” the ‘rats seem to be getting it passed regardless of what the gop wing of the uniparty does. And a large part of WHY is that we on the conservative side of the fence are willing to accept candidates that are embarassed to speak and act as conservatives.
agree if you do not agree on issues but do not agree if you won’t vote for Ken because you think he ran a bad campaign, infact I;ve never heard anyone even do that and think they will give the race to the Dems.
I just hope that others in VA do not share the same view as you and think letting the Clinton hack get a victory is better than having Ken because he might have ran a bad campaign.