Replies

It’s about a valid vs non-valid comparison, isn’t it?

It is. The quesion is why the potential negative effects of over prescribing narcotics is elevated to a status of being the only ones worth considering.

127 posted on 10/27/2013 2:51:27 PM PDT by tacticalogic

To: tacticalogic

128 posted on 10/27/2013 2:52:58 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (People will retain the power to control the Government, or it will retain the power to control them.)

To: tacticalogic

It’s about a valid vs non-valid comparison, isn’t it?

It is. The question is why the potential negative effects of over prescribing narcotics is elevated to a status of being the only ones worth considering.

In a contemporary setting, we have to address the ball field as it is. We may not like the bases being 90' apart, but they are 90' apart. So complaining because a guy was thrown out by 30', is silly. Until the rules change, he can't be safe having only gone 60'.

That's essentially what your argument is here. Until the FDA changes the laws, we have to address reality as it is.

What my advocacy is related to FDA rules, isn't germane to this discussion. The rules simply are. That's it.

131 posted on 10/27/2013 3:06:38 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (People will retain the power to control the Government, or it will retain the power to control them.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794