Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyDancer

Emancipation Proclamation said that the slaves were free but did not have the authority to free them didn’t it?


43 posted on 10/15/2013 2:50:14 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: mountainlion

When Union troops entered the South they were freeing slaves on the way according to the EP from Lincoln. In looking at the EP there were no slaves in the North to free, he had really no jurisdiction in the South and he was leery of offending the Border States and push them into the South’s war. The black abolitionist Frederick Douglas spoke out against the legality of the EP as in, what can it really do to end slavery.


53 posted on 10/15/2013 3:31:34 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: mountainlion

“Emancipation Proclamation said that the slaves were free but did not have the authority to free them didn’t it?”

The EP freed nobody. It did not apply to any state or territory that had not seceded, and even then it did not apply to the slaves in those areas of the seceded states that were under federal control. In the states over which there was no federal control there was no legal authority to enforce it. Thus, the EP freed no one.


64 posted on 10/15/2013 4:32:00 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson