Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is the Strategy. Now Do It
REDSTATE ^ | 10/9/2013 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 10/09/2013 8:56:40 AM PDT by JSDude1

Conservatives need to push the debt ceiling fight off the front burner to after Christmas.

Republican Leaders are begging us to merge the continuing resolution fight and debt ceiling fight. They covet this with all their mind and heart.

They do not want a stand alone fight on Obamacare. They want to conflate it with the debt ceiling so they can do a grand bargain and leave Obamacare alone.

Consider Rep. Paul Ryan’s op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. He wants a grand bargain and not once mentions Obamacare. Not once.

Friends, as I noted the other day, we lose everything if we merge the continuing resolution and debt ceiling fights.

What’s more, if the debt ceiling gets pushed to just before Christmas, the GOP will collapse in that fight just like they did with Obamacare in 2009.

I think somebody like Steve Scalise, who chairs the Republican Study Committee, needs to propose a short-term debt limit for a few weeks and attach to it the Full Faith and Credit Act that ensures the Treasury Department prioritizes interest payments in the event the debt limit is ever not increased. This would buy us some time to finish the fight to defund Obamacare and set us up well to fight the next long-term debt limit increase to the death by removing some of the President’s scare tactics. How do Republican Leaders not adopt and push such a proposal? How does Obama not accept it without looking completely unreasonable?

(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehner; cr; debt; reid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Call Boehner and your Republican Rep. to let them know this is what you think they should do:

http://www.speaker.gov/contact

U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 (202) 224-3121 TTY: (202)-225-1904

1 posted on 10/09/2013 8:56:40 AM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Prioritizing interest payments is essential. The scum running the country might default just to default.


2 posted on 10/09/2013 9:02:48 AM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

there is no point to prioritizing payments. a Default on any payment will be seen the same way by market forces. If you choose to pay your car loans but not your credit card, when you go to buy a new car they won’t care that you have always paid them first, they will just see that you have had trouble making your payments. The market will react to ANY default. You dont want to be holding the debt of somone that is prioritizing payments, even if you are at the top.


3 posted on 10/09/2013 9:09:56 AM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Perdogg
RE :”They do not want a stand alone fight on Obamacare. They want to conflate it with the debt ceiling so they can do a grand bargain and leave Obamacare alone.
Consider Rep. Paul Ryan’s op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. He wants a grand bargain and not once mentions Obamacare. Not once. “

Grand bargain??

Something irks me about the idea of giving all those federal workers on furlough more paid vacation during shutdown and then passing a big deal that cuts future medicare and social security, and Obama-care fully funded too.

In return for future cuts Ryan wants to offer Dems near turn spending increases over the house CR, typical.

Fortunately doesn't seem like Dems would go for this.

4 posted on 10/09/2013 9:12:05 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

“The scum running the country might default just to default.”

At this point, that might be the best possible outcome. If we default, the gravy train comes screeching to a halt, and there will be no option but to shrink government considerably. Forget about raising the debt ceiling, what is the point if nobody would loan us money?

It might be like a short term balanced budget amendment, in practical effect.


5 posted on 10/09/2013 9:16:03 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
I posted this three days ago:

In a way it is our very good fortune that Ted Cruz and Mike Lee precipitated this crisis over Obamacare rather than remaining passive on the promise of John Boehner and Mitch McConnell the fight over the issue of the debt ceiling. This not just because those promises by these two are illusory but because the Obamacare shutdown has smoked Obama out and provides cover to the Republicans to extend the debt while maintaining a shutdown in pursuit of Obamacare.

The problem is, as always, we cannot rely on our own troops to remain steadfast. But it seems that they of that we had better alert the country about Obama's unconstitutional intentions and we really should devise a strategy to deal with it. The most obvious strategy is, as I have described, to continue steadfast over Obamacare but extend the debt ceiling for a very limited time. Please note that Obama is insisting on a 13 month extension of the debt ceiling and will not otherwise negotiate. This is further evidence of his desire to force an emergency. At least the Republicans should keep the issue alive with a very short extension of the debt ceiling while depriving him of the justification for stealing the power of the purse from Congress.

I expect to receive some criticism for even consenting to extension of the debt ceiling but I await a better strategy to emerge.


6 posted on 10/09/2013 9:19:14 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HenryArmitage
there is no point to prioritizing payments. a Default on any payment will be seen the same way by market forces.

Not so. A "default" is defined as failing to pay any part of a pre-existing debt - i.e. interest or principal on a loan. That is very different from not paying full boat on some other governmental program that is merely a political promise.

Right now, the Treasury brings in well over $200 billion/month. The amount of interest payments and actual debt reduction (paying off bills, notes and bonds - even if there are many more issued that same month) pales in comparison to that number, so the only reason for a "default" (which would, after all, violate that terms of the 14th Amendment) would be a purposeful decision coming right from the top. No President can simply decide not to pay interest and principal because he would rather pay for some program that he likes better. It is a specific violation of the Constitution, and if he does it he should be impeached (and who cares what the Senate does - the impeachment itself would send the message that the Republicans can only be backed up so far).

I don't even know why the Rs want to pass a full faith and credit bill - Obama will veto it, but more importantly, IT ISN'T NECESSARY since the Constitution requires it.

7 posted on 10/09/2013 9:22:58 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

The majority of the republicans want government perks the rest of their lives just like the democrats do. obamacare is just a new perk they’ve figured out a way to give themselves.


8 posted on 10/09/2013 9:24:56 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt
The scum running the country might default just to default.

Or to put the nail in the coffin of the dollar being the world's reserve currency. Such a move would be nothing less than treason when national security implications are considered.

9 posted on 10/09/2013 9:35:12 AM PDT by RatRipper (The political left are utterly evil and corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

i don’t really care with the definition of ‘default’ is. Every financial person I have seen write about this agrees there is no difference between defaulting on an actual bond payment and defaulting on other payments the government must make. Markets will view it the same way.


10 posted on 10/09/2013 9:37:03 AM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

I thought that was already the law.


11 posted on 10/09/2013 9:39:28 AM PDT by Defiant (The National Debt needs to be put under House arrest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt; jazusamo; Perdogg

I agree, but I’m not sure a default is the end of the world as some would have it. Greece is still there last I checked.

Some dumb creditors who’d invested in Greece lost money.

If dumb creditors would quit loaning us money wouldn’t that be a good thing?


12 posted on 10/09/2013 9:39:55 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HenryArmitage

As much money as we have coming in there is no need for any default on the credit card or the car. We need to pay what is legally obligated and then cut out the yard service and the maid. We need to quit buying single malt and take the kids camping for a week instead of flying to Disney. The problem with liberals is they see all of the programs as a birthright, as absolutely necessary.


13 posted on 10/09/2013 9:51:50 AM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Hi, Nathanbedford! You will get NO flack from me, you are one of the most
informed people I know! If you think this what WE should do I am with you
whole heartedly! To the phones and e-mail I go, I halfway expect the NSA
to come knocking at my door! I have been so VERY surprised at the GOP
holding their ground, the citizenry must be EXTREMELY active!


14 posted on 10/09/2013 9:54:34 AM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

agree, but prioritization doesn’t do this.


15 posted on 10/09/2013 10:05:53 AM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Memo to GOP: If Obama Won’t Compromise, Don’t Raise the Debt Ceiling

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/10/memo-to-gop-if-obama-wont-compromise-dont-raise-the-debt-ceiling.php


16 posted on 10/09/2013 10:09:13 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

That’s right. The claim that not raising the debt limit equals “default” is simply a lie.


17 posted on 10/09/2013 10:10:40 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HenryArmitage

Legally forcing them to pay interest first doesn’t make sure the interest is paid? What?


18 posted on 10/09/2013 10:14:38 AM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

your statement was they should trim back (not disney land etc) the prioritation of debts doesnt make them trim back expenses ti makes them order their expenses on which get paid and which do not when the money runs out. even with Prioritization SOMETHING will not get paid. and reguardless of what that something is, the market will see it as an inability to pay debts.


19 posted on 10/09/2013 11:46:47 AM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HenryArmitage

Believe what you want. I still believe they should be legally obligated to meet certain obligations first. Insufficient cash to fund pet programs is far different from failure to handle debt service and the markets know the difference. One is a solvency issue, the other a political problem.


20 posted on 10/09/2013 1:52:08 PM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson