I’ve said it before, but it never ceases to amaze me how Candy Crowley has managed to last this long as an analyst. She is literally the least insightful political “Talking head” I have seen in my lifetime (leaving aside obvious dilettantes like Meg McCain). Her analysis’ read like a high school freshman taking a social studies exam - simplistic, over-eager, and parroting other people’s facts without adding any individual interpretation of their own.
Republicans should refuse to have people like Candy Crowley conduct presidential debates. Well known liberal activists like her should be, common sense, considered to be against republicans and everything they stand for. Why subject our candidates to someone who is plotting to diminish their standing?
-— She is literally the least insightful political “Talking head” I have seen in my lifetime -—
What about the gal on the All-Star panel who is so forgettable, I can’t remember her name. And I’ve watched the show for ten years.
She spouts conventional wisdom in the most tepid way.
Good ‘ol whatzername.
You could hear her “snuffling” while he was talking and the camera was just on him. You know she was distressed by his answers and wanted to jump in.
Watching his face as she “framed “the questions was priceless.
Cruz was masterful-on point and he knows the target.
Agreed. She is absolutely horrible at this job. This is the best CNN can do? Cruz demolished her amateur crap without breaking a sweat. She was sweating a lot, though I imagine that happens a lot at her resting heart rate.
Here is your answer courtesy of RUSH. Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.
This is a network that hired Ashleigh Banfield, for gods sake.