Sure, doubtless "Jefferson's concept of God is irrelevant" to you.
But it was certainly not irrelevant to Jefferson, whose list of "natural-sciences" you posted above.
Jefferson's list does not include subjects like theology, metaphysics, ontology, teleology or epistemology.
All of those, in Jefferson's mind, were outside the realm of practical "natural-sciences".
So, the fact that Jefferson did include ethics and law tells us he considered those also as practical natural-sciences, not necessarily requiring reference to theology derived from the Bible.
Point is: I am not at all clear as to why you resist the Thomistic idea that knowledge has two categories: 1) theology based on the Bible and 2) natural-sciences beginning with input from our senses?