What I have challenged is your interpretations,
***Bowlsheet, heretic. You want to argue that what you call “proof texts” don’t actually say what they do, that’s your business, but it is still heresy.
No, I argue that they say what they say.
You have interpreted them to mean something different.
I don't dispute that your interpretations are historically "orthodox".
But among history's unorthodox Christians were our Founding Fathers, and I'm here to defend their views.
I utterly reject your accusation that they were "damnable heretics".