Seriously, has anyone ever seen behavior like Kevmo's on Free Republic?
Is this normal & routine response to disagreements on FR religion forums?
What about News Activism threads?
The one previous time, years ago, I can recall a buzz-saw like Kevmo, (totally different subject) in the end, the mods deleted the whole thread.
But in that case there had been other posters, equally ugly, though somewhat less persistent.
So that whole thread was a mess.
In this case we have Kevmo going total nuts, while everyone else seems still highly reasonable...
Does anyone have a suggestion, beyond the obvious of refusing to respond -- which I will do, in due time -- but just wondering first if anyone has a suggestion to help poor Kevmo out?
Kevmo: "I see you are no longer in denial that you’re a troll. At least that’s a sign of progress."
FRiend, I fully acknowledge your total insanity, and I deny all your accusations, categorically.
Kevmo, you are a wolf howling at the moon, a howl which strikes fear in brave men & women, arouses us from sleep and arms us against your coming onslaught.
But there is no onslaught, because you are toothless, and insane.
So all you've really done, FRiend, is disturb some otherwise sound sleep...
Get help.
From spirited irish's article: "John identifies antichrists, in this case clergy who serve the devil rather than Christ, sequentially.
First, like Bultmann, Teilhard de Chardin, Robert Funk, Paul Tillich, and John Shelby Spong, they specifically deny the living, personal Holy Trinity in favor of Gnostic pagan, immanent or Eastern pantheist conceptions."
FRiends, I'm starting to wonder from this if maybe Kevmo is spirited irish's sock-puppet, hired-on to do her dirty work?
Would that be a fair conclusion?
Is Kevmo's job here to make certain no post of BroJoeK's goes unanswered -- in the most vile, murderous language imaginable?
And this, we all agree(??), is the appropriate response in an FR "News Activism" forum to disputes over historical interpretations of the Bible?
I'm just askin'.
Is this normal & routine response to disagreements on FR religion forums?
***Sure, they’ve been quite raucous in the past. That’s why the religion mod had to clamp down. But this article isn’t in the religion forum, so your trolling was allowed, then your hostility, then your mind reading, and even your heresy. None of your garbage would be allowed onto a caucus thread.
FRiends, I’m starting to wonder from this if maybe Kevmo is spirited irish’s sock-puppet, hired-on to do her dirty work?
***Hah hah hah. Isn’t it just like someone who reads his own theory into history to come up with a conspiracy theory? You hear that, Spirited? I’m your sock puppet. And he doubts MY sanity! Oh well, Jesus’s sanity was doubted as well. So, if someone logs onto a thread titled “Falling Stars, Damnable Heresy, and the Spirit of Evolution”, then pushes a damnable heresy, is such a troll expected to complain about being butt hurt after a spanking? Was Jesus being “reasonable” when he labelled false teachers “sons of the devil”? Or does brojoke uphold Jesus and freepers to a standard even higher than God Himself holds? We’ll never know, because brojoke won’t answer this question honestly, along with dozens of others he has blithely gone past in his quest to push a heresy onto FR.
Is this normal & routine response to disagreements on FR religion forums?
***Colofornian, you were battling heresy even when there was a republican presidential candidate involved. Perhaps you think we’re supposed to be “reasonable” with heretics?
Is Kevmo’s job here to make certain no post of BroJoeK’s goes unanswered — in the most vile, murderous language imaginable?
***Murderous? Where do you get that? Such bowlsheet would obviously be removed on a religion thread. So, aren’t you happy that you get to push your heresy here with relative impunity? Is BroJoke’s job here to make certain that Christ’s warning against false teachers should be ignored by “reasonable” people? That Christ was being unChrist-like when he keyed up on heretics like brojoke?