Well, by post #1667, YHAOS has already accused you of being a troll. None of those 4D’s in action would have survived.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3069049/posts?page=1667#1667
“What is your problem, exactly?”
The four D’s in action . . . ducking, dancing, dodging, and discharging (great gaseous displays).
****************************
Post #1680 would get deleted
Sure, but you seem to forget
***Religion mod would call that “making it personal”.
that Romans were the masters, and Jews their subjects.
There is no possible way — zero, zip, nada — that Romans would crucify anybody for the “crime” of blasphemy.
***by the way, here you were simply arguing over & over again against something that I didn’t say, if anything it was a simple typo.
*****************************
Post 1685 would have been removed.
YHAOS: “Miz boop, spirited, kevmo, and several others have spent an inordinate amount of their valuable time (especially boop and spirited) explaining their ideas.
Their reward has been your disrespect and contemptuous dismissal of their sincerity...”
***YHAOS is correct here, and those posts where your disrespect and contempt came out would have been deleted.
But Ms irish’s accusations against Freemasons, especially our Founders’ Freemasonry, are not serious.
***Here the mod would say you’re projecting and mind reading, not allowed.
Instead, they are the product of a mis-informed and malice-intending mind.
***the RM would definitely delete the post due to this statement. Such provocations are not allowed even on open religion threads.
**********************************
Post 1691, mind reading is not allowed
FRiend, I know that’s what you really intended to say,
*******************
Post 1680 would definitely get removed and probably get you a warning from the mod.
Yes, I “get” that you wish to focus, focus, focus on the guilt of the Jews, but I don’t see it that way.
********************************
Post #1790
What is your problem, FRiend, do you think I’m making this up?
***Such hostility aint allowed. Would have been removed.
*************
Post #1734, you push Crossan. Since he’s a heretic, such garbage wouldn’t be allowed on caucus threads, but perhaps the religion mod would allow it on open threads.
************
Post #1740, making it personal. Probably would get removed
This is a major issue with Kevmo, who seems pretty confused on the subject.
***********************
Somewhere in there you are pushing freemasonry garbage. That stuff wouldn’t be allowed on caucus threads. Probably would be allowed on open threads.
***********************
Post 1730 would get removed. Making it personal, hostility.
What is your problem, FRiend, do you think I’m making this up?
Did you ever read it all yourself?
***************************
Post 1731, you start ratcheting up the hostility and mind reading. Woulda been removed.
Once again, you wish us to forget who was the master and who were his subjects.
***By the way, here you start just being a plain troll, because you just repeat the same thing over and over again. But apparently trolling is allowed on open religion threads, not caucus threads.
*************************
In post #1805 you attribute your own theory to a fact of history. It is likely that the religion mod would not allow such obvious falsehoods, especially when accompanied by hostility.
So why you continue to deny the obvious truth of this matter is beyond me.
**********************
By post #1826, your sarcasm is dripping and it’s likely that most of your posts after that would be removed.
FRiend, you are deeply, deeply confused about the difference between “history” and “religious faith”.
Your religious faith drives you to justify what the Bible says, and to ignore all other data.
***Such statements are typically deleted and if this happens more than a couple of times, the religion mod asks you to leave the thread.
******************
So by this time in the thread, your dander is up, you’re in peacock projection mode, you often troll by saying the same thing over and over and over and so on. Up to this point, my hostility towards you is almost nonexistent and eventually I notice that you’re idealogically driven, and then I notice that you’re pushing heresy. The blame for the tone of this exchange between you & me is at your feet. I take responsibility for the tone between me & tacticalogic, a long term troll on FR.
Go ahead and log onto some caucus or ecumenical threads to see how many of your hostile posts get deleted. Maybe the religion mod allows some of your unhistorical heresy on some threads, maybe not. But by the 1820’s on this thread, you’re a troll, a heretic, and have set the tone for a brouhaha.
FRiend, I know how difficult this is for you, and how utterly confused you are, but YHAOS term "troll" was not addressed to yours truly, BroJoeK, but to tacticalogic.
Nor did YHAOS accuse tacticalogic of being a troll, only suggested that trolls on FR tend to eliminate themselves.
Kevmo quoting BJK: "There is no possible way — zero, zip, nada — that Romans would crucify anybody for the “crime” of blasphemy.
Kevmo responding: "***by the way, here you were simply arguing over & over again against something that I didn’t say, if anything it was a simple typo."
And this quote justifies which one of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo: "***YHAOS is correct here, and those posts where your disrespect and contempt came out would have been deleted."
Language in News/Activism forums is sometimes more rough-and-tumble than Religion forums.
And this justifies which of your accusations against me?
Kevmo quoting BJK: "But Ms irish’s accusations against Freemasons, especially our Founders’ Freemasonry, are not serious."
Kevmo responding: "***Here the mod would say you’re projecting and mind reading, not allowed."
Seriously? I can't imagine it.
BTW, the word "serious" in my sentence above refers to the "seriousness" of irish's accusations, not the "seriousness" of her mindset.
As such, it is a factual statement, and your accusations are ridiculous.
Kevmo quoting BJK: "Instead, they are the product of a mis-informed and malice-intending mind."
Kevmo responding: " ***the RM would definitely delete the post due to this statement.
Such provocations are not allowed even on open religion threads."
FRiend, I do "get" that you are highly confused and emotionally disturbed by the strong distinctions which Free Republic allows between its Religion Forum and News/Activism.
The truth is that my language here has been blunt, but very mild and restrained, even by News/Activism standards.
So, if you have a problem with that, then it is your problem, and you need to get help, and get over it.
Kevmo quoting BJK: " FRiend, I know that’s what you really intended to say"
Kevmo responding: "Post 1691, mind reading is not allowed"
But my post #1691 was simply a humorous/sarcastic response to some totally ridiculous accusations.
Even granting your claim (which I can't verify) that such responses are not allowed in Religion Forum, they are totally acceptable here, and indeed are the standard response to false accusations.
But to the point here: how does this quote justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo quoting BJK: " Yes, I “get” that you wish to focus, focus, focus on the guilt of the Jews, but I don’t see it that way."
Kevmo responding: "Post 1680 would definitely get removed and probably get you a warning from the mod."
Oh, and yet, despite your denials, isn't that precisely the effect of your letting Pilate off the hook for his role?
And how does this quote justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo quoting BJK: "Post #1790 What is your problem, FRiend, do you think I’m making this up?"
Kevmo responding: "***Such hostility aint allowed. Would have been removed."
But perfectly acceptable on a News/Activism thread.
And how, exactly, does this justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo: "Post #1734, you push Crossan.
Since he’s a heretic, such garbage wouldn’t be allowed on caucus threads, but perhaps the religion mod would allow it on open threads."
Sorry, FRiend, but Crossan is not a "heretic", he's a historian.
Only in your sick mind does "history" equal "heresy".
Kevmo quoting BJK: "This is a major issue with Kevmo, who seems pretty confused on the subject."
Kevmo responding: "Post #1740, making it personal.
Probably would get removed."
Perfectly acceptable for a News/Activism thread.
And how, exactly, does this justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo: "Somewhere in there you are pushing freemasonry garbage.
That stuff wouldn’t be allowed on caucus threads.
Probably would be allowed on open threads."
Freemasonry was practiced by our Founding Fathers.
Do you not "get" that I am here defending their religious ideas?
Are you telling us that our Founding Fathers would not be allowed on a Free Republic Religion forum thread?
And your authority for this assertion is what, exactly, Kevmo?
And how, exactly, does this justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo: "***By the way, here you start just being a plain troll, because you just repeat the same thing over and over again.
But apparently trolling is allowed on open religion threads, not caucus threads."
FRiends, where in the world do you ever get the idea that you are permitted to repeat your own arguments endlessly, but somehow BroJoeK is restricted to one time only in responding?
You have to know, that's just nuts.
If you wish to see BroJoeK stop repeating my responses, then stop repeating your yours.
And how, exactly, does this justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo quoting BJK: "So why you continue to deny the obvious truth of this matter is beyond me."
Kevmo responding: "In post #1805 you attribute your own theory to a fact of history.
It is likely that the religion mod would not allow such obvious falsehoods, especially when accompanied by hostility."
But the obvious hostility is all yours, FRiend.
My statements are all truthful, to the best of my knowledge.
By that same standard, almost none of your are.
Sorry, but that's a fact.
And how, exactly, does this justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo: "By post #1826, your sarcasm is dripping and it’s likely that most of your posts after that would be removed."
Kevmo quoting BJK: "FRiend, you are deeply, deeply confused about the difference between “history” and “religious faith”.
Your religious faith drives you to justify what the Bible says, and to ignore all other data."
Kevmo responding: "***Such statements are typically deleted and if this happens more than a couple of times, the religion mod asks you to leave the thread."
But they are acceptable in News/Activism threads, and so what is your problem?
And how, exactly, does this justify any of your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK?
Kevmo: "Go ahead and log onto some caucus or ecumenical threads to see how many of your hostile posts get deleted.
Maybe the religion mod allows some of your unhistorical heresy on some threads, maybe not.
But by the 1820’s on this thread, you’re a troll, a heretic, and have set the tone for a brouhaha."
But, but, but... dear FRiend, I did not go to your world.
I did not take onto myself your rules.
You came to, in effect, "my world" -- News/Activism.
The rules here are laxer, and when you start spreading BS, we call you on it HERE.
You don't get away with it here, and you can't hide behind the mods here.
Bottom line: nothing, nothing you've posted here justifies in any way your accusations against yours truly, BroJoeK.