[BroJoeK]

Kevmo referring to John 20:30: "***What a fascinating, beautiful and nice passage.
It also has nothing to do with what we’ve been discussing. So now it would appear that the troll is engaged in obfuscation.
Eventually it becomes prudent not to feed the trolls."

In fact, that is exactly what we are talking about, since it describes my religious beliefs, beliefs which you have at great length derided as "heretical" and even "trollish".

So, in opposition to what the Gospel writer John actually, explicitly did say in this passage, which you deem "heretical", you would have us accept as "orthodox" and even "historical" your own interpretations of "proof texts" which never actually say what you claim.

[Kevmo]

So, in opposition to what the Gospel writer John actually, explicitly did say in this passage, which you deem “heretical”, you would have us accept as “orthodox” and even “historical” your own interpretations of “proof texts” which never actually say what you claim.
***Nope. Once again you lie. I said it was wonderful that you consider it historically reliable. No doubt the other parts of scripture that you like to label “proof texts” you will consider historically unrreliable, because they directly contradict the heretical beliefs you are pushing.