[BroJoeK]

Kevmo on different interpretations of "proof texts": "***Sure they can, by heretics.
But what we were discussing is that those proof texts actually exist, they are sprinkled throughout the new testament.
Those texts are there, and the plain reading of them leads a normal person to acknowledge that Jesus claims Divinity.
But heretics like you will argue till the cows come home."

FRiend, I am familiar with many, if not all, of your "proof texts", and I also know the historical arguments which conclude they have been misunderstood.
We have even mentioned some of them on this thread.
Exactly how anybody interprets those "proof texts" is a matter of religion not history.

Kevmo: "***I did not call my religious beliefs “history”.
You like to accuse me of that, over and over an dover and over ... but it simply aint true.
At this point it qualifies as a lie — you are a liar. Now let’s see.
So far you are a troll, a heretic, and a liar.
And a crappy historian. That about sums it up."

Whew... for a moment there I was afraid you might get " "ignorant", "accusatory" and "projecting", to say nothing of "heretic"."
But you didn't.

;-)

[Kevmo]

FRiend, I am familiar with many, if not all, of your “proof texts”, and I also know the historical arguments which conclude they have been misunderstood.
***Such “historical arguments” in the past have been properly called out as the thread title says, Damnable Heresy. Pushing that idealogical garbage is what heretics do.