Kevmo: " ***I have seen that.
He has an idealogical agenda."
FRiends, I have not called anyone on this thread (or any other) a "damnable heretic", but isn't it both of your purposes here to identify and label people with that delightful sobriquet?
Indeed, haven't both of you practiced the fine arts of false accusations whenever rational arguments failed you?
Do you deny that?
Well, then please provide us with quotes where I have done what you claim above.
It’s simple. Just read the thread again. I came here to discuss historicity and you started “attributing thoughts and intentions” towards me that did not exist (I know my own thoughts & intentions). So by the time I went a few rounds with you, you refused to click on simple FR links that proved your bowlsheet was untrue, it became obvious after seeing “you had an idealogical agenda” that the agenda was simple heresy. It was a progression. And it was caused you you. I didn’t come here to argue against a heretic, I came to discuss historicity. But since you degenerated the discussion I am allowed to point out that you’re simply a heretic, a false teacher that Jesus has very harsh words for. You are properly labelled a damnable heretic.