[YHAOS]

Here's my point on this: reasonable people should be able to disagree reasonably on these matters without one side or the other feeling the need to burn somebody at the stake as a “damnable heretic.”

OK. But only if you promise not to feel the need to report any FReeper to the FBI as a possible terrorist.

[Kevmo]

OK. But only if you promise not to feel the need to report any FReeper to the FBI as a possible terrorist.
***Not necessary. We’re already on their radar because
1) we post on FR and
2) you just used a keyword combination that pushes us to the top of their list

[BroJoeK]

YHAOS: "But only if you promise not to feel the need to report any FReeper to the FBI as a possible terrorist."

I've seen nothing to suggest possible terrorists posting on Free Republic.
Nor have I ever called anybody a "terrorist".
But it is very interesting to note that in your mind, at least, "terrorist" and "heretic" are pretty much the same thing, no doubt deserving the same fate, right?

Which is why I come back, and back, and back again to the question of our Freemason Founders.
Do you consider them too as "heretics", and so reject their Constitution accordingly?