Kevmo: “You’re so quick to accuse me of being religious but you can’t establish even one time I’ve done it on this thread.”
Despite your claims to the contrary, in fact none of your arguments are non-religious.
***Yet another repetitive assertion from a heretic, a troll. And an unsubstantiated assertion at that.
All of them are efforts to justify your orthodox religious beliefs.
***No, I came here to discuss history and you started calling me a poser and all kinds of stuff, so it’s time to respond in time... because YOU ARE A HERETIC.
When you begin to study & account for non-religious historical reports, then you can claim to be “historical”.
***I can provide proof that I’ve done this, and FR gets the benefit. Here’s the link. Can you provide such proof? Nope.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2056400/posts
But, dear FRiend Kevmo, here is your real problem: “quick to accuse me of being religious”.
***That is exactly what you’ve been doing on this thread, brojoke.
“Being religious” is only an “accusation” if you pretend to be something else, so why do it?
***Where have I generated such a pretense... let’s see... nowhere. I posted about history and then I posted my religious viewpoint after I had already been forced to endure your bowlsheet.
Why not embrace your own faith?
***I love my faith. It’s the obvious Whole Truth. Your faith, on the other hand, is a simple heresy.
Why not ]]just tell us the truth of the matter: Kevmo believes orthodox understandings of the Bible because that is his religious faith, period, end of discussion?
***Because that is not the case. I was an atheist and then ran across this evidence that Jesus had claimed divinity before the Sanhedrin and accepted Christ as Savior. One came before the other. You, as usual, got it wrong. Flat wrong. So flat wrong that you appear to be operating as a heretic.
Nothing to be ashamed of, no need to seek outside “historical” justifications, no need to “debate” anything — it just is what it is.
***Gosh, the exact same thing could be said of you. But you can’t do that, can you, because you are pushing a heresy.
That’s my recommendation to you.
***My recommendation to you is to read more books rather than just this Crosan guy and come up to speed on the history. Click on a link here or there. You’re incredibly ignorant, you’re accusatory, projecting, and now I see you are a simple heretic. So if you educate yourself you might be able to shake free from this heretical unhistorical viewpoint that causes so much ugliness in your soul.
Obviously, you had no serious intention of discussion history and every intention of venting you bile on somebody you could label "heretic".
Kevmo: "***Where have I generated such a pretense... let’s see... nowhere. I posted about history and then I posted my religious viewpoint after I had already been forced to endure your bowlsheet."
Your alleged "history" is nothing more than religion masquerading as history.
Now at least you've dropped all pretense and revealed your true purpose, which is to label those who disagree with your "history" as "heretics".
Kevmo: "***Because that is not the case.
I was an atheist and then ran across this evidence that Jesus had claimed divinity before the Sanhedrin and accepted Christ as Savior.
One came before the other.
You, as usual, got it wrong. Flat wrong.
So flat wrong that you appear to be operating as a heretic."
Sorry, FRiend, but there's no "evidence".
It is simply your interpretation of text which others may well interpret differently.
It's a little like that old story of the emperor's new clothes -- sorry, but I just don't see them.
Kevmo: "You’re incredibly ignorant, you’re accusatory, projecting, and now I see you are a simple heretic."
FRiend, you can't know how relieved I am that Kevmo is not also "ignorant", "accusatory" and "projecting", to say nothing of "heretic".
</sarc>