Nothing wrong with you defending your religion: good for you. Just don’t pretend it’s “history”.
***That’s precisely what you’ve been doing, heretic.
Kevmo: “By all means, post some non-biblical texts and let’s see how they stack up.
So far you’ve posted one minor reference about Pilate that doesn’t even contradict the biblical account.”
This comment again proves that your views have nothing to do with history and everything to do with defending your orthodox religious beliefs.
***Um, no, the comment shows that you only posted one other account and it doesn’t do half of what you think it does for your efforts towards pushing your heresy.
If you had any serious interest in history itself, you’d already know the major texts & arguments.
***Go ahead and keep posting garbage rather than actual sources, heretic.
On the issue of Pilate, once again:
***Before I even read it, I’m guessing you won’t be posting any more sources.
I’ve mentioned this numerous times already, and each time you studiously ignore it, but here is one text which proves Pilate’s motivations:
***Well, whooptedoo. I was right. You didn’t post any more sources, just further conjecture from the gospels which you promptly proceed to discard as reliable sources. Only heretics would dare to do such a thing.
Luke 23:1-3 “Then the whole assembly rose and led him off to Pilate.
2 And they began to accuse him, saying, ‘We have found this man subverting our nation.
He opposes payment of taxes to Caesar and claims to be Messiah, a king.’
3 So Pilate asked Jesus, ‘Are you the king of the Jews?’ “
Of course, the story goes on from there,
***Hah HAH HAH HAH HAH. The full story completely shoots down your wishful viewpoint of Pilate and shows him to have found Jesus innocent of rebellion.
but in the end these verses — and others similar — prove that both Jews and Pilate well knew: rebellion is the only crime for which Pilate might order crucifixion.
***I see your game. You keep repeating your assertions. But with no historical backup, the only thing to do is to reaffirm that your assertions have been proven flat wrong. Repetitive assertions is a troll thing, something I would probably have to expect from heretics with an idealogical axe to grind.
Your ratio of insult to serious argument is running near 100% to zero.
Nothing for me to respond to here.