Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

Of course it did. That’s not the subject of debate.
***That’s precisely the subject of the debate.

The issue here is only your personal religious belief that Jesus’ words were somehow tantamount to claiming “equality” with God.
***That is not a religious belief. It is a historical observation. Historians don’t have a problem with it, but apparently you do. And to think, you were the one who went out of his way to point out the differences between religious faith and history. You can’t even tell the difference yourself.


1,864 posted on 12/19/2013 10:05:14 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1859 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
Kevmo: "That is not a religious belief.
It is a historical observation.
Historians don’t have a problem with it, but apparently you do.
And to think, you were the one who went out of his way to point out the differences between religious faith and history.
You can’t even tell the difference yourself."

But some historians certainly do dispute that Jesus claimed to be God Himself, or part of a triune God-head.
They say you are mis-translating and mis-interpreting what the New Testament writers intended.

Of course, you are free to dispute those historians.
I am only here to plead that you do it reasonably, without threatening to burn anybody at the stake as "damnable heretics".

1,881 posted on 12/20/2013 8:47:26 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1864 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson