Strangely enough, when many of the same of what you now call the “allegedly” mocking of Christians, was introduced to you, by yours truly, in 2009 on FR (see February of 2009, How Much Longer Can They Sell Darwinism?), you had no objection, just excuses for the misbehavior of Atheists attempting to use Science as a shield. Apparently you’ve decided that tactic doesn’t work, so you’ve now opted instead for denial. Obfuscation and denial are all you have. Hence my reference to “great billowing clouds,” which apparently drives you crazy.
Dawkins, and his many acolytes (fans), have been found guilty of violating the very canons of the science they pretend to praise as superior to any possible religion or other code of ethics.
Your denial efforts notwithstanding.
Speaking of yourself, of course, and believe me FRiend, I understand your need to unburden your own soul of its flaws, by projecting them onto others... ;-)
YHAOS: "Strangely enough, when many of the same of what you now call the “allegedly” mocking of Christians, was introduced to you, by yours truly, in 2009 on FR (see February of 2009, How Much Longer Can They Sell Darwinism?), you had no objection, just excuses for the misbehavior of Atheists attempting to use Science as a shield."
So let's see if I understand this -- to prove your claim that "Darwinists" mock Christians, you researched back in time FOUR YEARS to recover your own previous list of one-sided quotes, which by themselves prove nothing except a lively debate at that time?
And in the FOUR YEARS since, you can produce no new quotes?
And you have no quotes from this thread?
So let me suggest, FRiend, if it's mocking and insults which fill your soul, then why not check out some FR Civil War threads -- just be ready to duck when the bullets come flying out of your computer! ;-)
Might I suggest also, that in 2009 FR evolution debates were sometimes ill-informed, confused and tending to degenerate into name-calling.
So I'll let anyone judge if things have improved today.
Indeed, I'd challenge you to prove they have not.
YHAOS: "Dawkins, and his many acolytes (fans), have been found guilty of violating the very canons of the science they pretend to praise as superior to any possible religion or other code of ethics.
Your denial efforts notwithstanding.
"Found guilty"? You mean "accused of", of course.
I've never read anything by Dawkins, know of him only through these threads, but suspect he and others are very likely guilty as charged.
My only denial is: you won't find many of those people posting on Free Republic.