[Gene Eric]

So, your practice of equating science in general, and "Darwinism" in specific with atheism is simply false

The "practice" is application; it's the consequence of the condition expressed through equating that might be false. So, can we conclude atheists are idiots or "ass hats" notwithstanding the assuming rules of the unproven "chart of discourse"?

[BroJoeK]

If by that you mean some “Darwinists” are also atheists, then of course that’s correct.
But many are not, and neither science in general nor “Darwinism” specifically require any religious belief or non-belief.

Do we agree?

As to who might be more *ss-hattish than somebody else, I suspect that’s another one of those questions science just can’t answer.

;-)