Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: YHAOS; betty boop
YHAOS quoting betty boop, post 1,491: "I don't expect “science” to prove anything about God at all.
Certainly, I don't need it to. "

YHAOS responding to betty, but addressed to BroJoeK: "Which word didn’t you understand?"

YHAOS is obviously cleverly non-responding to my answer to Ms boop:

BroJoeK: "Then what exactly is your problem with it?"

My question remains unanswered: if you truly don't wish to impose your own personal super-natural explanations on natural-science, then what exactly is your problem with science?

1,576 posted on 12/13/2013 8:17:54 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1526 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

My question remains unanswered: if you truly don’t wish to impose your own personal super-natural explanations on natural-science, then what exactly is your problem with science?
***In past debates and even current ones

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3098291/posts?page=554#554

it is the atheist contingent which is showing a severe disrespect for science. In particular, the science behind historicity of one of the best attested events in all of history: That Jesus was put to death for the blasphemy of claiming equality with God. Even his enemies acknowledge the claim. There is no miracle to deny here, just simple history. But atheists with incredible idealogical blinders refuse to acknowledge a simple historical fact.


1,590 posted on 12/13/2013 2:01:47 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1576 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson