Projection, again . . . still. You desire the circumstance where you are privileged to write the questions (dictate the issues) and then likewise to demand the answers you want. If you don’t get to script the answers, you then declare your questions unanswered. If you wish those desirable situations, go to DU or DC (Darwin Central). That isn’t how we roll in Jim Robinson’s shire.
You’ve been around long enough to know better. But, you whine that you aren’t getting the answers you want and stamp your foot in a temper tantrum. Man up, wimp. In JR’s realm, no one holds your little hand.
Spirited irish and betty boop have taken the lead on this issue, with additional contributions by Alamo-Girl, hosepipe, and a few others. Their responses have been fulsome, but that doesn’t matter. They won’t “STFU,” so you bitch and moan that your questions aren’t being “answered.” Meaning you aren’t getting the answers you want to hear.
So, rather than do the research required to find answers that would demand more profound responses on the part of betty and spirited (as if you have the wherewithal to accomplish that feat), you respond with studied incomprehension, intellectual claim-jumping, or rolling around on your little rug, kicking your heels in frustration (standing off at a distance and peppering the assembly with spitwads).
Do you truly not understand that everyone is on to your schtick?
I’m not the one bitching about heresy.
It does seem that some of our correspondents over the years do not consider their questions answered unless they receive the answer they wanted in the first place.
Sadly, it looks that way to me, too, dear brother in Christ.
But tacticalogic is not alone in doing this sort of thing....
Thank you so much for writing!
In fact, tacticalogic has done yeoman work defending reason against a lot of nonsense.
YHAOS, you blow a lot of smoke to confuse issues, and sometimes refuse to answer simple, direct questions.