Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: YHAOS; BroJoeK; Alamo-Girl; spirited irish
Name them (the “questions” boop refuses to answer) and demand that they be answered. I think it likely that the outcome will be that boop has given you answers, but that you do not like the answers (and that you therefore prefer to pretend your questions have not been answered — ‘tis a common tactic of Alinsky devotees).

I have not refused to answer any question that BroJoeK has put to me. I LOVE it when people ask me questions! I wish more people would do it!!!

If I might have missed a question, or inadvertently overlooked one, I heartily invite BroJoeK to ask me the question again.

FWIW, I am not anti-science. I am not anti-evolution. (I do believe in evolution. I just think that evolution of the Darwinian type is pretty lame. In fact, I have some doubt that it is science at all.)

Like you, dear YHAOS, "my main objection is to Scientists of an Atheist persuasion, primarily if not entirely, who misrepresent themselves as speaking authoritatively, not personally, that Science proves God does not exist...."

Thank you so much for writing, dear brother in Christ!

1,374 posted on 12/02/2013 9:40:59 AM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1338 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
We've discussed the myriad issues for years I am quite comfortable attesting that you are not anti-science or anti-evolution.
1,393 posted on 12/03/2013 9:15:08 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1374 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop; YHAOS; tacticalogic
betty boop: "I have not refused to answer any question that BroJoeK has put to me.
I LOVE it when people ask me questions!
I wish more people would do it!!!"

In every post to you I've included at least one question, and often several, none of which you've answered directly.

So, why not go back and look?
Post my questions and your direct answers?

betty boop: "FWIW, I am not anti-science.
I am not anti-evolution. (I do believe in evolution.
I just think that evolution of the Darwinian type is pretty lame.
In fact, I have some doubt that it is science at all.)"

Then of course you are anti-science, by very definition of the term.
You loathe and despise the basic idea of science: natural explanations for natural processes.
Instead, you fervently wish to impose on science something it absolutely is not -- a super-natural dimension.

Nothing wrong with super-natural, it's just as real as natural, but it's outside the realm of science, whether you Ms boop like that or not.

So what exactly is your problem?

1,478 posted on 12/08/2013 6:34:39 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1374 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson