Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeltz25

It seems unfair to judge his actions in hindsight. A more appropriate question would be whether, given the information he had in the situation he faced, backing the mujahideen in Afghanistan during the 80’s was a good decision.


2 posted on 09/07/2013 10:20:39 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slings and Arrows

fair enough, i’d say he had a lot information back then, though.

we knew all about Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, what they were about. We knew the freedom fighters in Afghanistan weren’t exactly boy scouts. We knew about guys like Abdullah Azzam and Hekmatyar and the rest.

Back then the USSR was “the main enemy”. Reagan had a policy of supporting proxy wars to take them down. In Afghanistan, in Central America. In his view the end result of defeating the USSR was the main objective and if we had to get in bed with some folks, so be it. Just as in WW2 he had to throw in with the USSR against Germany.

I’m just saying I see some parallels here and I hope we learn from past mistakes.


4 posted on 09/07/2013 10:25:08 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson