Posted on 09/04/2013 6:13:28 PM PDT by Hojczyk
On the other side, you have Republicans -- Ronald Reagan, if he were president, would get Assad like that. He would. He would get Assad. And you would have most conservatives line up against -- for Ronald Reagan, in support of Ronald Reagan. But the element here, Carville, is that many people think that Barack Obama is incompetent and he can't -- he can't do this.
JAMES CARVILLE: Well, I will definitely -- he's handled the Middle East pretty well so far. Bin Laden --
O'REILLY: Really? You really think so.
CARVILLE: Yeah. We have had revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, all across the place. Again.
O'REILLY: Libya a mess. Iran is defiant.
CARVILLE: Come on, look. When is all of this -- when was it not? I mean, Gaddafi is gone. It is a mess, I agree with that. But, you know what, it's a mess and we haven't lost any kids over there which says something and --
O'REILLY: I'm not sure that's a litmus test, it doesn't seem to be any clear vision on the part of President Obama. He doesn't have -- 'here is what I want.' He doesn't have that.
CARVILLE: You know, what I would say and maybe a little bit of a different view here. I think what really is freaking people out is the incompetence of the Bush administration in Iraq.
O'REILLY: You're going to blame Bush?
CARVILLE: Of course, the Iraq thing is why people have so much trepidation about going into Syria. They said the last time we went over there, look what happened. I really think this has something to do with it.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Poor Obots can’t argue on the merits on any of the disastrous foreign policy of the Zero administration of domestic enemies to the Constitution, while the Middle East is plunged into chaos, destruction, Carville the lightweight can’t speak of the civil liberty, rights, freedom movements because they are non-existent. Thought that was what America stood for fool? Thought that’s what candy-ass libs like yourself taut daily?
Zero’s muzzie allegiances to Saudi Arabia showing once again as his schooling was paid for by Prince bin Talal, now trying to spread caliphate into Syria after running weapons via Libya. Syria with close ties to Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and an even bigger dangerous mess.
Chemical weapons? What a joke. Iran-Iraq war chemical agents were used, there was no U.S. intervention. Why so important now? There is no just war clause here. What does this rogue Zero administration want? Sure this Zero cabal is dangerous, but it’s run by moody women, sodomites, and associated nutjobs who are pathological liars so day to day this current administration is fortunately incompetent for the world to see.
People aren’t forgetting Bush and his decades long “Compassionate wars” costing trillions in American treasure, not to mention all the dead and thousands wounded.
We won zip~
My solution......force the Syrians to institute obamaCare........that will destroy them.
YugoVille is lucky to have anyone pay attention to his nonsense any longer.
Thank you for these quotes...
The real answer is Obama has set up conditions where muslim murders will replace an Irianian lap dog. Obama purposely withheld aid for deceient people to weaken them and set up conditions where his brethren could take over when Assad is gone. This is his MO. Know them by their acts.
The real answer is Obama has set up conditions where muslim murders will replace an Irianian lap dog. Obama purposely withheld aid for deceient people to weaken them and set up conditions where his brethren could take over when Assad is gone. This is his MO. Know them by their acts. I don’t want American armed forces to help Obama enslave and murder more people.
The truth about Saddam’s Iraq is buried somewhere in those tens of thousands of captured Iraqi documents the Dems insisted be removed from public view based on dirty bomb diagrams that were readily accessible on the internet. For some ungodly reason the Bush team went along.
bush went along, well, because he is one of them. Drudge is right - its not left vs. right anymore. Its authoritarian (fascists) vs. libertarian (freedom). History seems to indicate freedom doesn’t do so well statistically speaking.
Carville is a pig.
he is a ‘has been’ no longer popular and surprised Bill O.R had him as a guest..his days of being requested to be a guest on talk shows are long ago over...
his ship has sailed...and if not for his wife Mary he would not ever be heard from..ugly as sin to boot..damn I wouldn’t want to wake up with that next to me!!!!!Mary must have been desperate to get married to him..
Iraq was not a success. Maliki, friend of Iran, is just as bad as Saddam was. We should have bombed the mountains of Afghanistan flat and then left. Then tell the Muslims that the next act of terrorism would result in Mecca being turned into hot glass for 100 years.
Invading these countries and staying was the worst US military blunder since Custer decided it might be fun to pimp with a few Indians.
And the elder Bush should have kept us out of the first Gulf War. We saved the Saudis and they repaid us with terrorism. To hell with these people. Let them kill each other.
I agree. Why did Saddam invade Kuwait? Because Kuwait was "drinking his milkshake", they were side-drilling into Iraqi oil fields.
I see your points and agree with much more to be added.
Indeed.
Experience is not making the same mistake twice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.