Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

“You wrongly assume it is wrong. You also wrongly assume he is hiding his face in some kind of shame. He is hiding because he can be arrested.”

I think he’s hiding his face because he’s violating the UCMJ, not due to shame.

He does not have the right to protest in uniform, he signed up for service.

What illegal activities are you speaking of?


20 posted on 09/02/2013 9:27:55 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: EEGator; CodeToad

Illegal due to the fedgov knowingly lying about who used the chem weapons, for one. Knowingly and purposely supporting the enemy, for another. Enemy meaning AQ, MB and assorted insanely evil jihadis.

Apparently you think it’s fine to support and fight on the same side as AQ and the MB. Makes me really, really wonder who the h*** you are.


24 posted on 09/02/2013 9:31:19 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: EEGator
Respectfully Sir, these soldier's signed up and swore and oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

One of the first things I learned in the Army was that soldiers will only follow you if they trust you.

President Obama, Both the House and Senate have shown they can not be trusted.

UCMJ or the ultimate sacrafice in an undeclared war on foreign soil to the aid of enemies that would love nothing more than to witness the anniliation of the U.S.A. seems like an easy call to me.

Americia is defended by less than 1% of the ungreatful population of this nation. Maybe some of the ruling elite should show their dedication to this mission by placing their own children in harms way before they so callously send soldiers out to die needlessly on a mission that has no clearly defined end strategy and is designed to do nothing more than make President Obama look like he has a clue what he is doing.

36 posted on 09/02/2013 9:48:25 AM PDT by Newbomb Turk ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: EEGator

“he signed up for service.”

And why should that negate his political views? His ONLY obligation is to obey his orders, not become a silent slave.

I have never agreed with shutting down the military voice. All kinds of people spend money to influence the Congress and the President, yet, the very people whose lives are at stake get no voice at all. I am sure this is not what the founders had in mind for a national military. They wanted the States to have a say and the State militaries always had a say.

As part of the Communist takeover of this country they have silenced the members of the military and made laws to shut them up. Who better to know the ramifications of military use than the military? Yet, the Commies don’t want to hear from them.

Ever notice in our history that is has always been a Democrap Commie that got us entangled into war and it is always the Democrap that wants people to just shut up and do as they are told?


40 posted on 09/02/2013 9:52:44 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: EEGator

I would strongly disagree. When person enlists in the military he/she takes an oat to protect US/interests home and abroad. In the case of Syria no US interest involved. This is a time for our country to stop police everyone around the world. Europe and arab nations don’t do anything so why we have to endanger our military? High moral values? Building democracy in the ME? As of today there is only evidence that chemical weapons was used in Syria but no indication who used them. If UN have a problem, let them send their troops to Syrian meat grinder.


59 posted on 09/02/2013 10:08:37 AM PDT by QQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: EEGator

A POTUS does not leave men to die in a situation like Benghazi.......it was only a matter of time before this coward received blowback from the warriors.

A POTUS does not allow a warrior to hold his umbrella.

A POTUS does not send warriors into battle to fight WITH and FOR the enemy who murdered over 3000 countrymen on September 11, 2001.

Therefore, it only stands to reason that an American warrior can also draw red lines.


64 posted on 09/02/2013 10:12:36 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson