I would strongly disagree. When person enlists in the military he/she takes an oat to protect US/interests home and abroad. In the case of Syria no US interest involved. This is a time for our country to stop police everyone around the world. Europe and arab nations don’t do anything so why we have to endanger our military? High moral values? Building democracy in the ME? As of today there is only evidence that chemical weapons was used in Syria but no indication who used them. If UN have a problem, let them send their troops to Syrian meat grinder.
“When person enlists in the military he/she takes an oat to protect US/interests home and abroad. In the case of Syria no US interest involved. This is a time for our country to stop police everyone around the world. Europe and arab nations don’t do anything so why we have to endanger our military? High moral values? Building democracy in the ME? As of today there is only evidence that chemical weapons was used in Syria but no indication who used them. If UN have a problem, let them send their troops to Syrian meat grinder.”
I agree with all those points. We should not get involved in Syria at all. The Chief should not be making the point in his uniform though.
Absolutely...Screw the criminals in D.C. They betray us as a matter of routine. Fortress America gets my vote..
They want another globalist compassionate war lasting decades while lining the pockets of the super wealthy insiders?
Let the wealthy arrogant corrupt in Congress, the Senate and White House send their sons and daughters.
Spit*
Kerry has been very cagey when talking about the chem. weapons.
He says chem. weapons were definitely used but he never says who deployed them. Never.
Let me know when he starts emphatically saying it was definitely Assad or definitely the "rebels".
I don't think there is debate over chem. weapons being used. The question is who used them and Kerry gets a little vague. It's what he doesn't say.