The Randian understanding of liberty leaves you free to take up as many constraints on as you want. It doesn’t force anything on you. It’s up to you according to your conscience or your religious beliefs or whatever. That’s why it’s so annoying to see her compared with the left. Unlike the left, Rand doesn’t want to dictate what you can say or what you can do or what you do with your life. She leaves it up to you. Is that really so threatening?
Question for you: If we lived in a purely free market without any external, government, religious, social constraints, and somebody, acting in their own self interest, screwed you over on a contract, what would be your recourse?