Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

Not according to Robert Natelson, author of “The Original Constitution”

I don’t agree totally with his conclusions, because he does, a number of times, stress the Founders reliance on Vattel.

But according to him there is no doubt that what the Founders meant was a derivation of the British flavor... a “natural born citizen” was one who EITHER:
Was born on the land (Cruz wasn’t) or
Had a FATHER who was a citizen. (Cruz didn’t).

In addition, Cruz has (or had) dual citizenship. Conflicting allegiances. That’s a big problem.

This has zero to do with whether someone likes Cruz or agrees with what he says. We can’t elect someone ineligible just because we like what they say, that’s a tactic from the other side, where the outcome is more important than the means.


268 posted on 08/27/2013 10:07:52 AM PDT by djf (Rich widows: My Bitcoin address is... 1ETDmR4GDjwmc9rUEQnfB1gAnk6WLmd3n6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: djf
Had a FATHER who was a citizen. (Cruz didn’t).

Given that the stress is on one parent and given today's politically correct climate, and given that there has been no definitive ruling/law on this subject, can there be any doubt that since he has one parent who was a US Citizen that in today's political climate, he would be considered Natural Born?
270 posted on 08/27/2013 10:14:32 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson